Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maine Timberlands Charitable Trust Co Linda S Dalby Et Al Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Environment$2.8MEducation$476kRecreation & Sports$311kAnimals$45kYouth Development$40kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION$50,000
CENTER FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES$20,000
RANGELY LAKE HERITAGE TRUST$12,800
FOREST SOCIETY OF MAINE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEW ENGLAND FOREST FOUNDATION: $70k → 8%APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB: $30k → 16%SPATIAL INFORMATICS GROUP NATURAL ASSETS: $70k → 10%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MAINE: $49k → 7%NORTHERN FOREST: $50k → 7%LANDCAN: $33k → 7%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $35k → 9%OUR CLIMATE COMMON: $40k → 9%THE MAINE TREE FOUNDATION: $145k → 12%HIGH PEAKS ALLIANCE: $30k → 14%U MAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOUCES: $312k → 15%DOWNEAST LAKE LAND TRUST: $145k → 16%NEW ENGLAND FOREST FOUNDATION: $70k → 8%APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB: $30k → 16%NORTHERN FOREST CENTER: $40k → 7%MAINE TREE FOUNDATION: $70k → 12%UMO W GEO LAB: $175k → 15%DOWNEAST LAKE LAND TRUST: $75k → 16%NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION: $70k → 8%APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB: $30k → 16%MAINE SUMMER CAMPS: $40k → 7%MAINE TREE: $60k → 12%UMAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES: $169k → 15%NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION: $70k → 8%APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB: $30k → 16%MAINE SUMMER CAMPS: $32k → 7%MAINE TREE FOUNDATION: $60k → 12%UMAINE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY: $155k → 15%NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY: $50k → 8%MAINE SUMMER CAMPS: $30k → 7%MAINE TREE: $50k → 12%PINETREE STATE 4H CLUB: $67k → 15%NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%SMALL WOODLAND OWNERS ASSOC OF MAINE: $43k → 12%UMAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES: $56k → 15%NEW ENGLAND FOREST: $40k → 8%NORTHERN FOREST CENTER: $124k → 7%UMAINE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY: $50k → 15%MAINE AUDOBON: $50k → 7%MAINE HUTS AND TRAILS: $103k → 14%PINE TREE STATE 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION: $40k → 15%LAND CONSERVATION ASSISTANCE: $45k → 7%MAINE HUTS AND TRAILS: $43k → 14%UMAINE SCHOOL OF NATURAL: $165k → 15%MAINE AUDOBON: $35k → 7%MAINE HUTS AND TRAILS: $35k → 14%UMAINE MAINE 4H: $40k → 15%FOREST SOCIETY OF MAINE: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 16 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
30

Total granted

$1.9M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+45%

Still filing today

63%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $330k · revenue +218%
  • MT
    MAINE TREE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2022 · $275k · revenue +114% · 40% of their budget
  • DL
    DOWNEAST LAKES LAND TRUST
    2× · 2019–2021 · $220k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UM
    U MAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOUCES
    one grant, 2019 · $312k
  • US
    UMAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES
    one grant, 2022 · $224k
  • US
    UMAINE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $205k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
2
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
3
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
4
Somerset Woods Trustees

To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.

Environment
5
Protect Maine's Fishing Heritage Foundation
Environment
6
Great Mountain Forest Corporation
Philanthropy
7
Sebasticook Regional Land Trust

The mission of the SRLT is to recognize and conserve the rich wild and workinglandscape of Central Maine's Sebasticook River watershed through conservation,stewardship and education. Our focal programs are land conservation for…

Environment
8
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
9
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

10
Monhegan Associates Inc

The monhegan associates is a land trust dedicated to the ongoing preservation of the natural wild beauty and biotic communities of more than 350 acres of wildlands on monhegan island in maine.

Environment
11
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
12
Mahoosuc Land Trust Inc

To protect and conserve land and traditional land uses including farming, recreation, significant habitats, scenery, and water resources for the benefit of the public. The organization facilitates community-based conservation.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Downeast Lakes Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Our Climate Common. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

U MAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOUCES — $311,941 · OtherU MAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOUCESUMAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES — $224,000 · OtherUMAINE SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCESUMAINE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY — $205,000 · OtherUMAINE SCHOOL OF FORESTRYIndividual grant recipient — $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUMAINE SCHOOL OF NATURAL — $165,140 · OtherUMAINE SCHOOL OF NATURALNORTHERN FOREST CENTER — $124,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $122,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $85,000 · Other+20 more — $752,196 · Other+20 moreNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC — $330,000 · EnvironmentNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INCMAINE TREE FOUNDATION — $275,000 · EnvironmentMAINE TREE FOUNDATIONDOWNEAST LAKES LAND TRUST — $220,000 · EnvironmentDOWNEAST LAKES LAND TRUSTAppalachian Mountain Club — $160,000 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mountain ClubForest Society of Maine — $115,000 · EnvironmentForest Society of MaineSmall Woodland Owners Association of Maine — $42,500 · Environment+4 more — $98,800 · Environment+4 moreMaine Huts & Trails — $180,500 · EducationNorthern Forest Center Inc — $40,000 · EducationHIGH PEAKS ALLIANCE — $95,000 · Recreation & SportsMERRYSPRING INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsDOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION — $25,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES — $20,000 · AnimalsLand Conservation Assistance Network — $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD — $7,500 · Youth Development
Other$2,364,277Environment$1,241,300Education$220,500Recreation & Sports$115,000Animals$45,000Philanthropy$20,000Youth Development$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC — $330,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMAINE TREE FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetDOWNEAST LAKES LAND TRUST — $220,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetMaine Huts & Trails — $180,500 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club — $160,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetForest Society of Maine — $115,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetHIGH PEAKS ALLIANCE — $95,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSmall Woodland Owners Association of Maine — $42,500 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetNorthern Forest Center Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOUR CLIMATE COMMON — $40,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetViles Arboretum — $30,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetDOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC — $23,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLand Conservation Assistance Network — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMERRYSPRING INC — $20,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetCENTER FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES — $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMaine Appalachian Trail Club — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAINE TREE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DOWNEAST LAKES LAND TRUST
  • Who funds Maine Huts & Trails
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club
  • Who funds Forest Society of Maine
  • Who funds HIGH PEAKS ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Small Woodland Owners Association of Maine
  • Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc
  • Who funds OUR CLIMATE COMMON
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Viles Arboretum
  • Who funds DOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION
  • Who funds RANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC
  • Who funds Land Conservation Assistance Network

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME38.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Davis Conservation Foundation · Onion Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Quimby Family Foundation · John Sage Foundation · French Fdn Tr Udecl · Horizon Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Fields Pond Foundation Inc · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maine Timberlands Charitable Trust Co Linda S Dalby Et Al Trustees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc88% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maine Timberlands Charitable Trust Co Linda S Dalby Et Al Trustees?

Find your warmest path to Maine Timberlands Charitable Trust Co Linda S Dalby Et Al Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph