· Private foundation
Mai Tian Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mayborn Museum | $10,520 |
| Cedar Park Public Library Foundation | $10,500 |
| Fudan University Education Development Foundation | $6,000 |
| Joy Park for All Children | $1,500 |
| Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots | $599 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $200 |
| UT Austin | $200 |
| University of Dallas | $150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
| U Houston | $150 |
| Baylor University | $100 |
| Dallas Zoo | $100 |
| Central Texas College Foundation | $100 |
| Play for All Foundation | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history of the North Texas Area to inspire an interest in the past for the education and enrichment of people of all ages.
The Texas Association of Museums strengthens the Texas museum community through collaborations, connections, professional development, and advocacy.
Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.
To educate the public about forestry and preserve the history of the forestry industry.
Our mission is to engage the scientist in all of us by igniting a spirit of inquiry. We strive to
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
The association promotes and supports the museum of texas tech university and assists in securing monies, members, collections, and general goodwill or the educational and building programs of the museum.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Dallas and the most unlike its peers is Cedar Park Public Library Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CEDAR PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FUDAN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Houston Museum of Natural Science ↗
- Who funds University of Dallas ↗
- Who funds Travis County Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds Travis Audubon Society Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS POLICE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BEE CAVE ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds The Falls on the Colorado Museum ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mai Tian Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.