Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mahal Family Hemkund Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$161k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$142k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.8MReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$7kInternational$5kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $142k
$5,488
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM FOUNDATION$142,180
Individual grant recipient$6,040
G Next Media USA LLC$5,488
Individual grant recipient$3,750
Individual grant recipient$2,250
ARTLOGIC INC$979
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 27% of grant dollars ($482k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 73% that went abroad ($1.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MUSEUM OF ART PHOTOGRAPHY FOUNDATIO: $138k → 16%OPEZEE PRIVATE LIMITED: $64k → 15%AMERICAN INDIAN FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%German Herrera Photography: $11k → 8%ARJOT K SANDHU: $10k → 9%SUKHDEEP SEMBI: $3k → 10%TEJPAUL SINGH BAINWAL: $6k → 12%RAJWANT SINGH: $4k → 16%G Next Media USA LLC: $5k → 19%ARTLOGIC INC: $2k → 20%OVERSEAS VOLUNTEER FOR A BETTER IND: $3k → 14%SUNMIT SINGH: $15k → 6%INKSPILL: $62k → 11%MUSEUM OF ART PHOTOGRAPHY FOUNDATIO: $130k → 16%TRITON MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 8%SUKHDEEP SEMBI: $2k → 10%ARTLOGIC INC: $1k → 20%SIKH YOUTH COMISSION INC: $10k → 6%INKSPILL: $24k → 11%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%ARTLOGIC INC: $979 → 20%INKSPILL: $16k → 11%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 73% of all-years giving ($1.3M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$1.1M · 10 grants
Canada$144k · 2 grants
India$64k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 7 repeat orgs$558k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against -98% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$1.2M
$401k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
-98%

Still filing today

14%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BONHAMS
    5× · 2018–2022 · $805k
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF ART PHOTOGRAPHY FOUNDATIO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $268k
  • I
    INKSPILL
    3× · 2019–2022 · $101k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $82k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $80k
  • OP
    OPEZEE PRIVATE LIMITED
    one grant, 2023 · $64k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BONHAMS: $805,069 · OtherBONHAMSMUSEUM OF ART PHOTOGRAPHY FOUNDATIO: $268,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF ART PHOTOGRAPHY FOUNDATIOROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $142,180 · OtherROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINKSPILL: $101,400 · OtherINKSPILLIndividual grant recipient: $82,073 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $80,001 · OtherOPEZEE PRIVATE LIMITED: $63,500 · Other+15 more: $232,130 · Other+15 moreTRITON MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 · Arts & CultureOVERSEAS VOLUNTEER FOR A BETTER INDIA INC: $2,500 · InternationalEAST BAY YOUTH CRICKET ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,774,353Arts & Culture$5,000International$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRITON MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEAST BAY YOUTH CRICKET ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TRITON MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds OVERSEAS VOLUNTEER FOR A BETTER INDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY YOUTH CRICKET ASSOCIATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mahal Family Hemkund Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mahal Family Hemkund Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mahal Family Hemkund’s filings →

    More from the funding graph