Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Magnolia Foundation

$53k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Housing & Shelter$923kReligion$647kInternational$584kCommunity Improvement$174kFood & Nutrition$143kHealth$114kEducation$104kHuman Services$86kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$337
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salvation Army Waco$50,000
Waco Goodfellas Inc$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $65k → 17%CMTM-CHILDREN MATTER THE MOST - FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $3k → 7%FAITHBUILDERS INC: $1k → 16%CASA OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
MI
NY
MA
NJ
KS
TN
NC
SC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 14 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
47

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+40%

Still filing today

71%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WACO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $100k · revenue +63%
  • TT
    TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $65k · revenue +522%
  • COMPASSION MINISTRIES OF WACO
    2× · 2018–2019 · $29k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JUDE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $255k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TEXAS
    one grant, 2021 · $165k
  • HO
    HEART OF CENTRAL TEXAS INDEPENDENT LIVING
    one grant, 2018 · $107k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Waco Collective Impact Initiative

To establish a measureable agenda for improving the community and support the implementation of interventions in the community to address the goals contained in this agenda.

Community Improvement
2
Waco Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Collaborative Inc

Start up waco is a texas nonprofit organization formed via collaboration of cross-sector partnerships that aspire to lead waco's entrepreneurial support efforts and elevate waco as a hub for business innovation.

Community Improvement
3
Historic Waco Foundation Inc

To collect, maintain, preserve, publish and interpret the heritage and history of waco, mclennan county, texas

Arts & Culture
4
Waco Shepherd's Heart Inc

We feed, clothe, empower and advocate for families in need throughout our community.

Human Services
5
Waco Civic Theatre

The mission of the waco civic theatre, a non-profit organization, is to provide the heart of texas community with quality live theatre, to create an outlet for community education and participation in all aspects of productions, and to…

Arts & Culture
6
Waco Downtown Farmers Market

To create opportunities for individuals to make healthy food choices, for the poor to have access to fresh local produce, to participate in a vibrant local food system and create a farmers market in city of waco, texas.

Food & Nutrition
7
Waco Chamber of Commerce Community Dev

Educational

Community Improvement
8
United Way of Waco-Mclennan County

United way of waco-mclennan county strengthens the community by mobilizing resources to measurably improve lives.

Philanthropy
9
Leaders of Texas Foundation Inc

To provide housing and training for troubled children.

Human Services
10
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

11
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
12
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compassion Ministries of Waco and the most unlike its peers is Kyle Lake Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Animal Rescue and AdoptionAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsSubstance Abuse TreatmentCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Child and Family ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%59%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JUDE — $552,593 · OtherST JUDEIndividual grant recipient — $512,494 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JUDE HOSPITAL — $255,193 · OtherST JUDE HOSPITALTHE COVE — $205,217 · OtherTHE COVEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TEXAS — $165,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TEXASHEART OF CENTRAL TEXAS INDEPENDENT LIVING — $107,067 · OtherWACO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $100,000 · Other+34 more — $577,499 · Other+34 moreRestoration Development Foundation Inc — $583,527 · PhilanthropyRestoration Developme…TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · PhilanthropyTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION …+1 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyFEEDING TEXAS — $105,000 · Community ImprovementCOMPASSION MINISTRIES OF WACO — $28,800 · Community Improvement+2 more — $5,000 · Community ImprovementCOVENANT HOUSE — $64,817 · Human ServicesCASA OF MCLENNAN COUNTY — $30,000 · Human Services+2 more — $3,500 · Human ServicesGOOD SPORTS INC — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOSS CLUB FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentWACO GOODFELLAS INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNBOUND NOW — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC — $40,000 · ReligionLEGACY FAMILY MINISTRIES — $10,000 · ReligionFUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE — $4,000 · ReligionKINDNESS FOR KIDS INC — $25,000 · EducationADVOCACY CENTER FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND CHILDREN — $10,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $9,500 · EducationLIVE OAK CLASSICAL SCHOOL — $8,000 · Education
Other$2,475,063Philanthropy$663,527Community Improvement$138,800Human Services$98,317Youth Development$57,500Religion$54,000Education$52,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRestoration Development Foundation Inc — $583,527 over 3y, 24% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS — $105,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWACO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $100,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $64,817 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF MCLENNAN COUNTY — $30,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCOMPASSION MINISTRIES OF WACO — $28,800 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetNATIONAL MPS SOCIETY INC — $26,610 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKYLE LAKE FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetWACO FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSS CLUB FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSHINE RECOVERY HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetADVOCACY CENTER FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND CHILDREN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE OAK CLASSICAL SCHOOL — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCREATIVE WACO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGB LINDSEY FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND — $5,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetWACO GOODFELLAS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDR PEPPER MUSEUM AND FREE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCEN-TEX AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $4,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNBOUND NOW — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS MUSEUMS & HALLS OF FAME FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCMTM-CHILDREN MATTER THE MOST - FAMILY LIFE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFAITHBUILDERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWACO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DBA GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Restoration Development Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FEEDING TEXAS
  • Who funds WACO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds MISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC
  • Who funds GOOD SPORTS INC
  • Who funds CASA OF MCLENNAN COUNTY
  • Who funds COMPASSION MINISTRIES OF WACO
  • Who funds NATIONAL MPS SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds KINDNESS FOR KIDS INC
  • Who funds LIFE REMODELED
  • Who funds KYLE LAKE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WACO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOSS CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LEGACY FAMILY MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SUNSHINE RECOVERY HOUSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cooper FoundationTX26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cooper Foundation · Baylor University · Waco Foundation · Clifton Foundation · Bernard & Audre Rapoport Foundation · Ascension Providence · Christian Mission Concerns · Margaret Cb & S Spencer N Brown Foundation Inc · The Fentress Foundation · United Way of Waco-McLennan County · Once Upon a Time Foundation · Paul & Jane Meyer Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Magnolia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Magnolia Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Magnolia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph