Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Magnified Giving

To provide grants to local charities through youth participating in the youth Philanthropy education provided by Magnified Giving.

$232k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$64kFood & Nutrition$35kHealth$21kAnimals$19kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $17,075 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $232,283 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $215,208 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$5,625
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
4 Paws for Ability$6,250
Dayton Dream Center$5,625
JEE Foods$5,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%4 Paws 4 Ability: $8k → 9%Dayton Dream Center: $6k → 14%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $6k → 9%4 Paws for Ability: $6k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $6k → 9%Care Closet: $6k → 10%4 Paws 4 Ability: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freedom Tails Ohio

Animal Rescue

Animals
2
FIGHT2FEED a Charitable Organization

To feed the needy and homeless

Food & Nutrition
3
4 Paws Sake

4 Paws Sake, Inc. is a group of volunteer (we have no paid employees) dog lovers whose mission is to rescue, provide sanctuary, and ultimately to re-home abandoned, stray and neglected dogs. We also assist dogs who, because of extenuating…

Animals
4
Purple Paws 2nd Chance Rescue
Animals
5
Bi-State Pet Food Pantry

To keep pets with their families during financially difficult times.

Animals
6
Paws Fur Hope

We rescue pets from neglect foster them and then adopt them to suitable families

Animals
7
K-Lees Food Pantry Nfp

Distribute food to the needy

Food & Nutrition
8
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
9
Christina Homecare Food Pantry Inc
Food & Nutrition
10
Faithful Forgotten Best Friends

Provide pet food, vaccinations, basic veterinary care and assitance with spay and neuter costs for the pets of the homeless and less fortunate in downtown Columbus area.

Animals
11
Joeys Food Fight
Food & Nutrition
12
Advocates 4 Animals Pet Food Pantry

Advocates 4 Animals A4A Pet Pantry is a 100% volunteer 501c3 nonprofit dedicated to keeping animals with their families during financial hardship by providing pet food and spay-neuter assistance. We also operate an adoption program caring…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freestore Foodbank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jee Foods. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $31,575 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INCDAYTON DREAM CENTER — $5,625 · Human ServicesDAYTON DREAM CENTERCARE CLOSET — $5,546 · Human ServicesCARE CLOSETLA SOUPE INC — $7,185 · Food & NutritionLA SOUPE INCLAST MILE FOOD RESCUE — $5,750 · Food & NutritionLAST MILE FOOD RESCUECHILDHOOD FOOD SOLUTIONS — $5,700 · Food & NutritionCHILDHOOD FOOD SOLUTIO…JEE Foods — $5,200 · Food & NutritionJEE FoodsFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $5,105 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODBANK INCPETS FOR PATIENTS — $8,153 · AnimalsPETS FOR PATIE…PROTECT 4 PAWS CO — $5,250 · AnimalsPROTECT 4 PAWS…FRANKIES FURRY FRIENDS RESCUE — $5,250 · AnimalsFRANKIES FURRY…CHEMO-UNITY LLC — $7,135 · PhilanthropyCHEMO-UNITY…1N5 — $7,125 · Philanthropy1N5THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION — $7,350 · HealthTHE DRAGON…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $6,017 · HealthCHILDREN'S…YELLOW RIBBON SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $8,376 · EducationSMILES FOR SENIORS — $7,808 · OtherSMILES FOR SEN…Sugartree Ministry Center Inc — $5,812 · OtherSugartree Mini…BARRACKS PROJECT INC — $5,146 · OtherBARRACKS PROJE…
Human Services$42,746Food & Nutrition$28,940Animals$18,653Philanthropy$14,260Health$13,367Education$8,376Other$18,766

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $31,575 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $8,376 over 1y, 10% of budgetPETS FOR PATIENTS — $8,153 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION — $7,350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLA SOUPE INC — $7,185 over 1y, 0.5% of budget1N5 — $7,125 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $6,017 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSugartree Ministry Center Inc — $5,812 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLAST MILE FOOD RESCUE — $5,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDHOOD FOOD SOLUTIONS — $5,700 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDAYTON DREAM CENTER — $5,625 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROTECT 4 PAWS CO — $5,250 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetJEE Foods — $5,200 over 1y, 27% of budgetBARRACKS PROJECT INC — $5,146 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $5,105 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005KY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Magnified Giving funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph