Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mae Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$726k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$416kArts & Culture$202kEnvironment$200kHealth$150kReligion$50kScience & Tech$25kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $716k
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$200,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$166,240
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLINDS$50,000
THE BRUCE MUSEUM INC$50,000
APPLE HILL MCENTER FOR CHURCH$50,000
MIGHTY WRITERS$50,000
NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FES$50,000
SMITH COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLINDS: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
CA
VA
AZ
NM
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 4 repeat orgs$568k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$316k
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+38%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $181k · revenue +93%
  • MIGHTY WRITERS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $90k · revenue +53%
  • TA
    Taos Arts Council
    2× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +59% · 36% of their budget

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +4%
  • SL
    STEMARTS LAB
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
2
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
The National Museum of Women in the Arts

The mission of the national museum of women in the arts is to collect, conserve and elevate the achievements of women artists from all nationalities and to educate the public on their outstanding accomplishments. we strive to accomplish…

—
6
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
7
Smithsonian Institution

*increase and diffusion of knowledge* is the mission set forth by james smithson. the smithsonian endeavors to shape the future by preserving our heritage, discovering new knowledge, and sharing our resources with the world.

Arts & Culture
8
Denver Art Museum

The primary mission of the denver art museum is to enrich the lives of present and future generations through the acquisition, presentation, and preservation of works of art, supported by exemplary scholarship and public programs related…

Arts & Culture
9
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
10
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

—
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation of the Fine Arts Museums; the most unlike its peers is Stemarts Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYMAYO CLINIC: $100,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICAPPLE HILL MCENTER FOR CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherAPPLE HILL MCENTER FOR CHURCHNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FES: $50,000 · OtherNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · Other+8 more: $85,500 · Other+8 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $181,240 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUN…MIGHTY WRITERS: $90,000 · EducationMIGHTY WRITERSTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF…BRUCE MUSEUM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBRUCE MUSEUM I…STEMARTS LAB: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSTEMARTS LABAMAS MUSICAL THEATRE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAMAS MUSICAL T…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $50,000 · Human Services
Other$613,000Education$286,240Arts & Culture$135,000Human Services$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $181,240 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS: $90,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRUCE MUSEUM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTEMARTS LAB: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTaos Arts Council: $17,500 over 2y, 36% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMAS MUSICAL THEATRE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSociety of the Muse of the Southwest: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mae Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mae Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Vermont Studio Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Bruce Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mae Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mae Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mae Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph