Skip to content

· Private foundation

Madge M Vincent Charitable Test Trust - 460003015

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$186kRecreation & Sports$75kHuman Services$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$229k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK$6,000
THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES LTD$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BETHANY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER$5,000
NEW VIEW OKLAHOMA INC$5,000
WOVEN LIFE$5,000
TWIN CEDARS INC$5,000
HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION$2,500
OKLAHAVEN CHILDREN'S CHIROPRACTIC CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $15k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$374k
$0

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WOVENLIFE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +10%
  • TC
    The Children's Center Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +141%
  • Hearts for Hearing Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +116%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

    The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

    Human Services
    2
    The Centers for Habilitationtch

    Finding creative and innovative ways to provide hope and purpose for individuals with disabilities.

    Employment
    3
    Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

    Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    Horizons of Okaloosa County Inc

    To create a path from disability to capability by providing exceptional services so people of all ages can work, plan, learn, achieve personal goals, and live meaningful lives.

    Human Services
    5
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

    United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

    Philanthropy
    6
    The Children's Center Foundation

    None

    Philanthropy
    7
    Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

    The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

    —
    8
    The Arc of Oklahoma Inc

    The Arc of Oklahoma, Inc. promotes and protects the human rights of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and supports their full participation in the community throughout their lifetime. We aim to educate,…

    Human Services
    9
    Independent Opportunties Inc of Oklahoma

    Provide the highest quality residential services to people with developmental disabilities. a major part of the mission is to provide opportunities to these individuals based upon their right to a normal daily routine. specifically, it is…

    Unclassified
    10
    The Blind Childrens Center Inc

    The mission of the Blind Children's Center, Inc. is to prepare infants, toddlers and preschoolers of all abilities to thrive through inclusive, family-focused early childhood education, with a specialized focus on children who are blind or…

    Education
    11
    Connections for Life

    Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

    Health
    12
    Capability Health & Human Services

    Capability health and human services is dedicated to providing transformational and life enhancing services to children and adults with disabilities facing a physical, mental, or social limitation.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newview Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is Beyond the Spectrum Ok Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Individual grant recipient: $54,733 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOKLAHAVEN CHILDREN'S CHIROPRACTIC CENTER: $36,000 · OtherOKLAHAVEN CHILDREN'S CHIROPRACTIC CEN…MAKE PROMISES HAPPEN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA CAMP: $32,500 · OtherMAKE PROMISES HAPPEN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA…WOVENLIFE INC: $58,000 · Human ServicesWOVENLIFE INCHearts for Hearing Foundation: $40,000 · Human ServicesHearts for Hearing FoundationThe Children's Center Inc: $40,600 · HealthThe Children's Cente…THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $26,000 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR INDIV…COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsCOFFEE CREEK…TWIN CEDARS INC: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsTWIN CEDARS …BEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC: $32,000 · EducationBEYOND TH…NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $11,500 · Employment
    Other$123,233Human Services$98,000Health$66,600Recreation & Sports$42,500Education$32,000Employment$11,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOVENLIFE INC: $58,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc: $40,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC: $32,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetCOFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $26,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTWIN CEDARS INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds WOVENLIFE INC ↗
    • Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
    • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
    • Who funds BEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC ↗
    • Who funds COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER ↗
    • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES ↗
    • Who funds TWIN CEDARS INC ↗
    • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Wegener Foundation IncOK17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Wegener Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Harris Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Dexter G Johnson Educational & Benevolent Trust · E Phil & Roberta Kirschner Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Madge M Vincent Charitable Test Trust - 460003015 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madge M Vincent Charitable Test Trust - 460003015. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
    • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Madge M Vincent Charitable Test Trust - 460003015’s filings →

    More from the funding graph