Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Madge M Vincent Charitable Test Trust - 460003015

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$186kRecreation & Sports$75kHuman Services$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$229k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK$6,000
THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES LTD$6,000
BETHANY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER$5,000
NEW VIEW OKLAHOMA INC$5,000
TWIN CEDARS INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WOVEN LIFE$5,000
HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION$2,500
OKLAHAVEN CHILDREN'S CHIROPRACTIC CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $15k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $8k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$374k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$374k
$0

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsEducationEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WOVENLIFE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +10%
  • TC
    The Children's Center Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +141%
  • Hearts for Hearing Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +116%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

    The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

    Human Services
    2
    The Centers for Habilitationtch

    Finding creative and innovative ways to provide hope and purpose for individuals with disabilities.

    Employment
    3
    Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

    Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    Horizons of Okaloosa County Inc

    To create a path from disability to capability by providing exceptional services so people of all ages can work, plan, learn, achieve personal goals, and live meaningful lives.

    Human Services
    5
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

    United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

    Philanthropy
    6
    The Children's Center Foundation

    None

    Philanthropy
    7
    Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

    The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

    8
    The Arc of Oklahoma Inc

    The Arc of Oklahoma, Inc. promotes and protects the human rights of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and supports their full participation in the community throughout their lifetime. We aim to educate,…

    Human Services
    9
    Independent Opportunties Inc of Oklahoma

    Provide the highest quality residential services to people with developmental disabilities. a major part of the mission is to provide opportunities to these individuals based upon their right to a normal daily routine. specifically, it is…

    Unclassified
    10
    The Blind Childrens Center Inc

    The mission of the Blind Children's Center, Inc. is to prepare infants, toddlers and preschoolers of all abilities to thrive through inclusive, family-focused early childhood education, with a specialized focus on children who are blind or…

    Education
    11
    Connections for Life

    Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

    Health
    12
    Capability Health & Human Services

    Capability health and human services is dedicated to providing transformational and life enhancing services to children and adults with disabilities facing a physical, mental, or social limitation.

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newview Oklahoma Inc and the most unlike its peers is Beyond the Spectrum Ok Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Individual grant recipient — $54,733 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOKLAHAVEN CHILDREN'S CHIROPRACTIC CENTER — $36,000 · OtherOKLAHAVEN CHILDREN'S CHIROPRACTIC CEN…MAKE PROMISES HAPPEN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA CAMP — $32,500 · OtherMAKE PROMISES HAPPEN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA…WOVENLIFE INC — $58,000 · Human ServicesWOVENLIFE INCHearts for Hearing Foundation — $40,000 · Human ServicesHearts for Hearing FoundationThe Children's Center Inc — $40,600 · HealthThe Children's Cente…THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES — $26,000 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR INDIV…COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsCOFFEE CREEK…TWIN CEDARS INC — $12,500 · Recreation & SportsTWIN CEDARS …BEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC — $32,000 · EducationBEYOND TH…NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC — $11,500 · Employment
    Other$123,233Human Services$98,000Health$66,600Recreation & Sports$42,500Education$32,000Employment$11,500

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOVENLIFE INC — $58,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc — $40,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation — $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC — $32,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetCOFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER — $30,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES — $26,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTWIN CEDARS INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC — $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds WOVENLIFE INC
    • Who funds The Children's Center Inc
    • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation
    • Who funds BEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC
    • Who funds COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER
    • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES
    • Who funds TWIN CEDARS INC
    • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Wegener Foundation IncOK17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Wegener Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Harris Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Dexter G Johnson Educational & Benevolent Trust · E Phil & Roberta Kirschner Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Madge M Vincent Charitable Test Trust - 460003015 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 45%
    • Newview Oklahoma Inc45% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph