Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maccarthy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$17MEducation$14MArts & Culture$11MHealth$7.8MRecreation & Sports$3.0MReligion$500kHuman Services$22kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $8.0M
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL$5,010,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$3,000,000
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$100,000
OPERA THEATRE OF SAINT LOUIS$20,000
RANKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$15,000
CITY ACADEMY$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS$10,000
MARYGROVE CHILD CENTER$5,000
THE MAGIC HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SNEAKERS WITH SOUL: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 14 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$34M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+29%

Still filing today

71%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $6.4M · revenue +72%
  • FP
    Forest Park Forever Inc
    2× · 2018–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +154%
  • CA
    CITY ACADEMY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $620k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • JB
    JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10M · revenue -15%
  • MT
    MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2018 · $4.0M · revenue -48%
  • RS
    ROSSMAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $3.0M · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
2
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
3
Our Lady of the Woods Corporation

To operate a private school for age 3 through eighth grade students.

—
4
The St Louis Children's Choirs

Transforming lives through musical excellence. the goal of the st. louis children's choirs is to empower the youth of st. louis through a rich choral program that helps each young singer realize their full potential - as a musician and as…

—
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
7
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
8
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
9
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
12
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Magic House; the most unlike its peers is Sneakers With Soul. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $16,000,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INCST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $7,780,000 · OtherST LUKE'S HOSPITALROSSMAN SCHOOL: $3,000,000 · OtherROSSMAN SCHOOL+7 more: $568,500 · OtherJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $10,000,000 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOLCITY ACADEMY INC: $620,000 · EducationCITY ACADEMY INC+3 more: $126,000 · EducationSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6,362,500 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY O…MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $4,000,000 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSO…+2 more: $300,000 · Arts & CultureForest Park Forever Inc: $3,001,000 · EnvironmentGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentSNEAKERS WITH SOUL: $10,000 · Human ServicesDWIGHT F DAVIS MEMORIAL TENNIS CENTER: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$27,348,500Education$10,746,000Arts & Culture$10,662,500Environment$3,001,000Youth Development$1,080,000Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $16,000,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $10,000,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6,362,500 over 8y, 11% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $4,000,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $3,001,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSSMAN SCHOOL: $3,000,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC: $620,000 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $160,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE: $140,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetRanken Technical College: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCARE AND COUNSELING INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSNEAKERS WITH SOUL: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetDWIGHT F DAVIS MEMORIAL TENNIS CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BELLEFONTAINE CEMETERY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROSSMAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis ↗
  • Who funds THE MAGIC HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Ranken Technical College ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE AND COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds SNEAKERS WITH SOUL ↗
  • Who funds DWIGHT F DAVIS MEMORIAL TENNIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Women of Achievement ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BELLEFONTAINE CEMETERY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centene FoundationMO24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centene Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · The Crawford Taylor Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Edward Jones Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · August a Busch III Charitable Trust · Clifford Willard Gaylord Foundation · Berges Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maccarthy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maccarthy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Maccarthy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Maccarthy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maccarthy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph