Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maben-Davis Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Health$450kInternational$126kFood & Nutrition$100kHuman Services$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kEducation$8kArts & Culture$5kHousing & Shelter$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC$100,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$25,000
CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK$25,000
FREE CLINIC OF SW WA$12,500
SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OREGON AND$2,000
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$2,000
PORTLAND SYMPHONIC GIRLCHOIR$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
YWCA CLARK COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA CLARK COUNTY: $1k → 9%YWCA CLARK COUNTY: $1k → 9%YWCA CLARK COUNTY: $1k → 9%NEW HEIGHTS FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%NEW HEIGHTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%NEW HEIGHTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$740k · 13 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$740k
$1k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +64%
  • SH
    SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $26k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • YO
    YWCA OF COLUMBIA-WILLIAMETTE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.

Education
2
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
3
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
4
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
Girl Scouts of Western Washington

Girl scouting builds girls* of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
9
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
10
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Heights Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $400,000 · OtherNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $100,000 · OtherCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANKFREE CLINIC OF SW WA — $45,000 · OtherFREE CLINIC OF SW WA+4 more — $12,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KI…NEW HEIGHTS FOUNDATION — $32,500 · Human ServicesNEW HEIGH…SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $26,000 · Human ServicesSHARED HO…YWCA CLARK COUNTY — $3,000 · Human ServicesLinfield University — $8,000 · EducationPORTLAND SYMPHONIC GIRLCHOIR — $4,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$557,000International$110,000Human Services$61,500Education$8,000Arts & Culture$4,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $400,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS FOUNDATION — $32,500 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND SYMPHONIC GIRLCHOIR — $4,750 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA CLARK COUNTY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds NEW HEIGHTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Linfield University
  • Who funds PORTLAND SYMPHONIC GIRLCHOIR
  • Who funds YWCA CLARK COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maben-Davis Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Linfield University4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph