· Private foundation
M Eichorn Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Pirchei Shoshanim | $36,000 |
| Cong Zichron Chazon Ish | $22,800 |
| KEREN ORAH | $11,000 |
| YESHIVA RUACH CHAIM | $5,000 |
| Cong Yeshiva Bais Milel | $5,000 |
| Beth Medrash Govoha | $4,000 |
| KHAL OHR YOEL MEIR | $3,610 |
| Khal Talmidei Hayeshivos Inc | $2,000 |
| Yeshiva Emek Hatorah | $1,500 |
| KOYM Gemach Fund | $1,200 |
| BAIS TOVA | $1,000 |
| Beis Medrash of Pine Lake Park Inc | $1,000 |
| American Friends of Daas Aharon | $1,000 |
| Keren Simchas Chaim | $1,000 |
| Mesivta of Passaic | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- YRYESHIVA RUACH CHAIM INC3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue -2%
- CZCong Zichron Chazon Ish2× · 2022–2024 · $25k
- KOKEREN ORAH2× · 2023–2024 · $18k
Funded once
- CTCONGREGATION TIFERES TZVIone grant, 2023 · $36k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $9k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
Religious School
Provide a building for a religious school.
To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.
A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIRCHEI SHOSHANIM INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA RUACH CHAIM INC ↗
- Who funds GEMACH OF JACKSON INC ↗
- Who funds BAIS TOVA INC ↗
- Who funds YESHUAS CHAIM INC ↗
- Who funds KEREN SIMCHAS CHAIM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON INC ↗
- Who funds BNOS BRACHA INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
- Who funds BAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Fund Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Jewish Communal Fund · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Joe & Eileen Sutton Family Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization M Eichorn Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M Eichorn Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bnos Bracha Inc: 9% of income from government
- Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
- Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on M Eichorn Family’s filings →