· Private foundation
M & R Horowitz Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $8k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $120,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,340 |
| Chai Lifeline | $2,160 |
| Mosdos Bobov | $1,084 |
| Tomchei Shabbos of LA | $1,080 |
| Hatzalah of Borough Park | $432 |
| Relief Resources | $360 |
| Tov V'Chesed Foundation | $250 |
| Bonei Olam | $59 |
| Yeshiva Ch'san Sofer | $40 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.
62 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CLCHAI LIFELINE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +58%
- BOBonei Olam Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +224%
- RRRELIEF RESOURCES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +183%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $11k
- CBCONG BNEI TORAHone grant, 2017 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
Assistance to the indigent
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
To award financial grants to religios orthodox jewish organizations and to help by financial means, the needy, sick and disabled people.
To provide medical support to families in need
To help ill persons
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
How this is measured
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 234 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Greenzweig Family Foundation · The Ohr Yitzchok Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Blum Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Donors Fund Inc · J & E Wolf Foundation Inc · The Strasbourg Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization M & R Horowitz Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M & R Horowitz Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to M & R Horowitz Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to M & R Horowitz Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on M & R Horowitz’s filings →