Does Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01 accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.

Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01

Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01 at a glance

· Private foundation

Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01

Q: What does Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01 fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (30%), Education (23%), Human Services (11%).

Q: Who are Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Aquinas Institute of Rochester ($15k), American Cancer Society Inc ($8k), St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc ($7k).

Q: Does Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01 fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$2k

Largest

01What it funds

0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$29kEducation$21kHuman Services$11kReligion$9kAnimals$5kCivil Rights$4kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500

Median grant

States reached

$111k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
AQUIANAS INSTITUTE OF ROCHESTER	$2,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL	$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY	$1,000
VA TECH COLLEGE OF VET MED	$1,000
ST IGNATIOUS CHURCH	$500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION	$500
ANIMAL CARE SOCIETY	$500
Individual grant recipient	$500
ST FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS	$500
Individual grant recipient	$500
RESURRECTION CATHOLIC CHURCH	$500
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES	$500
Individual grant recipient	$500
FRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY	$500
WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT	$500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$84k · 20 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$84k

$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+46%

Still filing today

55%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TA
THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCHESTER
7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +84%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +145%
FC
FRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +2%

Funded once

VM
VA MD COLLEGE OF VET MED
one grant, 2018 · $2k
CR
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +41%
TI
The Independence Fund Inc
one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +13%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health

United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—

Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion

Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health

St Francis Hospital Inc

We, saint francis hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. francis hospital is a member of trinity health of the mid-atlantic…

Health

St Francis Foundation

We, st. francis foundation and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. francis foundation is a member of st. francis healthcare and trinity…

—

University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—

Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative

Health

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health

Foundation Fighting Blindness Retinal Degeneration Fund

The foundation fighting blindness retinal degeneration fund's mission is to accelerate the translation of retinal laboratory-based research into clinical trials to expedite the commercialization of patient therapies.

Health

Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

19/22

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$38,000Education$20,853Health$15,700Human Services$13,300Animals$4,500Food & Nutrition$1,250Public Benefit$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Lynne and Allan Toth Family Charitable Foundation U/A Dtd 7/5/01’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home