Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lynn R & Karl E Prickett Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of LYNN R & KARL E PRICKETT FUND’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $109k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZATION$30,000
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIANS ASSOCIATION OF KAUAI$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$14,000
SOUND EXPERIENCE$10,000
ANGEL STRONG LLC$10,000
WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$10,000
SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
VETERANS EXPLORATION THERAPY$8,000
UPPER MISSOURI WATERKEEPER INC$8,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE$7,000
NORTHWEST FILM FORUM$6,000
SUSAN HOWARD'S NOVATO BOXING CLUB$5,000
BENJI PROJECT$5,000
LITTLE VILLAGE FOUNDATION$5,000
NORTH BAY CNA$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AL OTRO LADO INC: $12k → 11%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $14k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $14k → 9%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIANS ASSOCIATION OF KAUAI: $25k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 9%THE RICHARD DE LONE SPECIAL HOUSING: $18k → 8%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%THE RICHARD DE LONE SPECIAL HOUSING PROJECT: $15k → 8%The Richard De Lone Special Housing: $13k → 8%THE RICHARD DE LONE SPECIAL HOUSING PROJECT: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY LOAVES: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY LOAVES: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 44 repeat orgs$634k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
49

Total granted

$2.0M
$572k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+21%

Still filing today

82%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT
    5× · 2017–2025 · $126k · revenue +46%
  • H
    HOPELINK
    6× · 2017–2022 · $109k · revenue +74%
  • GP
    Global Pediatric Alliance
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • SH
    SUPER HEROES HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +56%
  • IN
    INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
6
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
7
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
10
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the most unlike its peers is North Bay Cna. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Food Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/92
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,473

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/87
Grantees still filing
64/87
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT — $126,000 · OtherAMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZATSUSAN HOWARD'S NOVATO BOXING CLUB — $86,833 · OtherSUSAN HOWARD'S NOVATO BOXING CLUBIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $73,000 · OtherOASIS FOR KIDS — $57,983 · OtherCHILDHAVEN — $54,021 · OtherKauai Sailing Association — $75,500 · OtherDG Educational Services — $78,583 · OtherDG Educational ServicesSound Experience — $60,145 · Other+44 more — $734,669 · Other+44 moreHOPELINK — $109,341 · Human ServicesHOPELINKPrader-Willi Homes of California — $91,733 · Human ServicesPrader-Willi H…SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $69,021 · Human ServicesSHARED HOPE IN…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KAUAI — $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHR…COMMUNITY LOAVES — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LOAV…AL OTRO LADO — $12,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesGlobal Pediatric Alliance — $103,750 · Arts & CultureGlobal Ped…Little Village Foundation — $49,950 · Arts & CultureLittle Vil…NORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $31,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST …From The Heart Productions — $25,000 · Arts & CultureFrom The H…GROTON HILL MUSIC INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureGROTON HIL…FRACTURED ATLAS INC — $18,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED …+3 more — $13,380 · Arts & CultureTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $36,400 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $36,200 · EnvironmentNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $25,380 · EnvironmentSPOKANE RIVERKEEPER — $25,000 · EnvironmentINLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST — $25,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $21,500 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE — $10,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND — $10,000 · EnvironmentSnake River Waterkeeper Inc — $10,000 · Environment+2 more — $11,500 · EnvironmentPREDATOR DEFENSE — $35,000 · AnimalsWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $22,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $18,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE — $17,625 · AnimalsCheetah Conservation Fund — $17,625 · AnimalsTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION — $17,625 · AnimalsLONG LIVE THE KINGS — $15,000 · AnimalsTHE KINDNESS RANCH ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $11,729 · AnimalsProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS — $5,865 · AnimalsHOMEWARD PET ADOPTION CENTER — $5,865 · AnimalsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $51,060 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $26,460 · InternationalMADRE INC — $21,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $15,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC — $10,000 · InternationalANGEL-STRONG LLC — $10,000 · InternationalBUILDON INC — $5,000 · InternationalFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS — $5,000 · International+1 more — $4,807 · InternationalINTER-NATION CULTURAL FOUNDATION — $73,200 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI — $60,660 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,421,734Human Services$342,095Arts & Culture$261,080Environment$210,980Animals$166,334International$148,327Philanthropy$139,860

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT — $126,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetHOPELINK — $109,341 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Pediatric Alliance — $103,750 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetPrader-Willi Homes of California — $91,733 over 9y, 20% of budgetSUSAN HOWARD'S NOVATO BOXING CLUB — $86,833 over 9y, 22% of budgetDG Educational Services — $78,583 over 8y, 26% of budgetKauai Sailing Association — $75,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetINTER-NATION CULTURAL FOUNDATION — $73,200 over 3y, 13% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $73,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $69,021 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI — $60,660 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSound Experience — $60,145 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDHAVEN — $54,021 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $51,060 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLittle Village Foundation — $49,950 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetSOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER — $46,200 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $40,247 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHOOD CANCER GUIDES — $40,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $39,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $36,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $36,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE — $35,750 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPREDATOR DEFENSE — $35,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $31,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $26,660 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $26,460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING A GLOBAL COMMUNITY — $26,400 over 2y, 38% of budgetNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $25,380 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPOKANE RIVERKEEPER — $25,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetINLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY LOAVES — $25,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $22,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMADRE INC — $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGROTON HILL MUSIC INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $18,682 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUpper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc — $18,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE — $17,625 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCheetah Conservation Fund — $17,625 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION — $17,625 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $17,625 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONG LIVE THE KINGS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gunzenhauser Chapin FundNC74.8× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gunzenhauser Chapin Fund · Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · The Burning Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lynn R & Karl E Prickett Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Groton Hill Music Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lynn R & Karl E Prickett Fund?

Find your warmest path to Lynn R & Karl E Prickett Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph