Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lynch Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$237kHealth$221kEducation$161kHuman Services$128kPhilanthropy$112kFood & Nutrition$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kRecreation & Sports$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $54k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S RC CHURCH$12,400
WESTOVER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$11,200
MON GENERAL HOSPITAL$10,000
UNITED WAY OF MON AND PRESTON COUNTIES$10,000
ST FRANCIS GRADE SCHOOL$10,000
MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT$4,200
ST URSULAS FOOD PANTRY$3,200
WVU COLLEGE OF B & E$3,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,700
CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH$2,500
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,500
SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE$2,200
COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC$2,200
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,200
WVU CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%THE SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $1k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $2k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 51 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
5

Total granted

$1.1M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+21%

Still filing today

24%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +78%
  • CM
    CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +453%
  • MA
    MOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • WF
    WVU FOUNDATION - ATHLETIC CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • SR
    SCOTT'S RUN PARK AND RECREATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWESTERN PA
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
2
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
3
Monongalia County Youth Services

Youth shelter

Human Services
4
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
5
Panhandle Home Health Inc

To provide home health care services - nursing, therapy and support services to patients in berkeley, morgan and jefferson counties, w.v.

Health
6
Mountain State Justice Inc

Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.

Crime & Legal
7
Keystone Hospice

Providing comprehensive home-based and facility based hospice care to children and adults with life limiting and life threatening illnesses in southeastern pennsylvania. in addition, keystone hospice provides residential care through…

Human Services
8
Keystone Care

Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.

Health
9
Marion County Rescue Squad Inc

To provide quality ambulance service to the residents of marion county, west virginia.

—
10
Valley Health Care Inc

Valley health care, inc. is a federally qualified health center which provideds medical services to the residents of mill creek, elkins, and the surrounding areas within west virginia.

Unclassified
11
Summers County Council on Aging Inc

Provide services to senior citizens of Summers County, West Virginia.

Human Services
12
Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc

To provide services to the senior citizens of Pocahontas County, West Virginia

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scotts Run Settlement House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cheat Lake Volunteer Fire Dept Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S RC CHURCH: $136,600 · OtherST MARY'S RC CHURCHWESTOVER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $100,800 · OtherWESTOVER UNITED METHODIST CHURCHST FRANCIS GRADE SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherST FRANCIS GRADE SCHOOLTHE FOUNDATION OF MON GENERAL HOSPITAL: $90,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION OF MON GENERAL HOSPITALUNITED WAY OF MON AND PRESTON COUNTIES: $88,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MON AND PRESTON COUNTIESWVU COLLEGE OF B & E: $38,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $34,000 · Other+42 more: $430,424 · Other+42 moreCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC: $21,750 · Human ServicesSCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $19,800 · Human ServicesSHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $14,600 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $10,800 · Human ServicesMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $21,800 · HealthTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionCheat Lake Volunteer Fire Dept Inc: $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMONONGALIA COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,007,824Human Services$66,950Health$21,800Food & Nutrition$12,000Public Safety & Disaster$9,000Recreation & Sports$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $22,800 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $21,800 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC: $21,750 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $19,800 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $14,600 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBARTLETT HOUSE INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $10,800 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCheat Lake Volunteer Fire Dept Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetStar City Volunteer Fire Dept Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMONONGALIA COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BARTLETT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING ↗
  • Who funds Cheat Lake Volunteer Fire Dept Inc ↗
  • Who funds Star City Volunteer Fire Dept Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John M Brown Family FoundationOH26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John M Brown Family Foundation · George D Hott Foundation · United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites Inc · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Empty Bowls Monongalia · Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust · Your Community Foundation of North Central Wv Inc · Weldon Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lynch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lynch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lynch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph