Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lyerly Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$719k
Granted FY2023
34
Grants FY2023
12
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Lyerly Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Virginia Tech Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 18 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Lyerly Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 21 organizations, $719k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
’17
13
’19
16
’20
20
’21
20
’22
21
’23
14
’24
18
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MScience & Tech$252kFood & Nutrition$98kReligion$90kHuman Services$73kArts & Culture$53kHealth$46kInternational$44kOther$0
02FY2023 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k28 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$1,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALEM ACADEMY & COLLEGE$500,000
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$105,000
UNC ARTS AND SCIENCES FOUNDTION INC - LYERLY STUDENT FUND$26,000
PRESBYTERIAN MISSION$17,000
RADFORD CITY SCHOOLS - PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC$10,100
FEEDING AMERICA SOUTHWEST VA$10,000
RADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD$5,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE & HYGIENE$5,000
BEANS AND RICE$5,000
RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$5,000
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA$5,000
RADFORD ELF SHELF$2,500
GLENCOE MUSEUM$2,500
RADFORD CLOTHING BANK$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HUMANKIND: $1k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%HUMANKIND: $1k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDERN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%BEANS AND RICE: $5k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $500 → 16%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $5k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $1k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $1k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $1k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
RI
KY
WV
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 44 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
16

Total granted

$2.3M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+84%

Still filing today

52%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $545k · revenue +14%
  • TV
    THE VIRGINIA BIOSCIENCE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $201k · revenue +870%
  • RC
    RADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $138k · revenue +7% · 89% of their budget

Funded once

  • RU
    RADFORD UNIVERSITY BIOLOGY SPEAKER FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -23%
  • PM
    PRESBYTERIAN MISSION AGENCY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
2
Virginia Foundation for Agriculture Innovation and Rural Sustainability

To assist rural virginians in developing and advancing their agricultural, economic and social interests to enhance their quality of life.

Environment
3
The Virginia College Fund

Solicitation of public contributions on behalf of member colleges. provides foundations, businesses, and individuals a convenient way of supporting small colleges and universities in virginia.

Education
4
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
5
University of Virginia Law School Foundation

The university of virginia law school foundation's primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds for the benefit of the university of virginia school of law.

Education
6
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
7
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
8
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
9
West Virginia University Research Corporation

To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.

Education
10
Medical College of Va Foundation

To support and foster vcu health and vcu health sciences through philanthropy, stewardship, innovation, communication, and collaboration.

Education
11
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
12
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Southwest Virginia; the most unlike its peers is Radford Elf Shelf Inc Radford Elf Shelf Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
30/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $707,850 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE: $545,000 · EducationSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGERADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $533,000 · EducationRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCRADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC: $137,750 · EducationRADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $22,000 · EducationUNC ARTS AND SCIENCES FOUNDTION INC - LYERLY STUDENT FUND: $226,000 · OtherUNC ARTS AND SCIENCES FOUNDT…NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE …NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE …PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RADFORD: $60,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RADFO…RADFORD UNIVERSITY BIOLOGY SPEAKER FUND: $50,000 · OtherRADFORD UNIVERSITY BIOLOGY S…UNC - LYERLY STUDENT FUND: $40,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $30,095 · Other+49 more: $176,000 · Other+49 moreTHE VIRGINIA BIOSCIENCE FOUNDATION: $201,000 · Science & Tech+1 more: $500 · Science & TechFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $54,104 · Food & NutritionRADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD: $41,200 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionRADFORD ELF SHELF INC RADFORD ELF SHELF INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesBeans and Rice Inc: $13,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC: $7,510 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC: $5,074 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $4,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS: $2,000 · Human ServicesSCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA: $30,150 · Arts & CultureBlacksburg Master Chorale: $1,269 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE: $21,000 · HealthPeggy Lillis Foundation: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · Health
Education$1,945,600Other$792,095Science & Tech$201,500Food & Nutrition$95,804Human Services$46,584Arts & Culture$31,419Health$22,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $707,850 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE: $545,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $533,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetRADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC: $137,750 over 5y, 89% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $54,104 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD: $41,200 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetSCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA: $30,150 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRADFORD ELF SHELF INC RADFORD ELF SHELF INC: $15,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetBeans and Rice Inc: $13,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetRadford Clothing Bank: $11,750 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC: $7,510 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC: $5,074 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc: $4,679 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $4,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL: $3,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWest Virginia Highlands Conservancy Inc: $2,116 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $2,057 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBlacksburg Master Chorale: $1,269 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTYCAUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Spikenard Farm Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA BIOSCIENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds RADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RADFORD ELF SHELF INC RADFORD ELF SHELF INC ↗
  • Who funds Beans and Rice Inc ↗
  • Who funds Radford Clothing Bank ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the New River Valley IncVA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · New River Valley Health Foundation · Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Celanese Foundation · United Way of Southwest Virginia Inc · C E Richardson Benevolent Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lyerly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lyerly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lyerly’s filings →

More from the funding graph