Skip to content

· Public charity

Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-Ucla Medical Center

To engage in biomedical research, train young scientists, and provide community health services.

$4.0M
Granted FY2022
29
Grants FY2022
15
States reached
$510k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Education$7.1MHealth$2.4MInternational$293kCrime & Legal$244kScience & Tech$95k
02FY2022 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 29 grants below total $3,256,677, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,967,899 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $711,222 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $264k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$74,568
Median grant
15
States reached
$153M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS$509,561
EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL$343,904
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO$315,527
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$283,678
REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$227,113
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND$215,063
KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE$157,400
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS$129,649
REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$102,991
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA$97,500
UNIV OF ROCHESTER$96,914
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$95,248
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$87,360
POPULATION COUNCIL$74,867
NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$74,568
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $58k → 11%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS: $130k → 14%UNIV OF ROCHESTER: $97k → 14%POPULATION COUNCIL: $150k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO: $316k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON: $138k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $87k → 21%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $181k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $459k → 11%BOARD REGENTS-UNIV WISCONSIN: $77k → 10%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $506k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $215k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $284k → 27%NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $31k → 16%NOVADIGM THERAPEUTICS INC: $523k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $78k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $123k → 19%TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $159k → 10%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $34k → 11%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS: $106k → 14%POPULATION COUNCIL: $75k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO: $53k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON: $68k → 16%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $83k → 21%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $157k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $375k → 11%BOARD REGENTS-UNIV WISCONSIN: $40k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $80k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $272k → 27%NOVADIGM THERAPEUTICS INC: $351k → 13%TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $65k → 10%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $30k → 11%POPULATION COUNCIL: $69k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON: $42k → 16%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $58k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $56k → 11%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $95k → 14%CHARLES DREW UNIVERSITY: $27k → 14%UNIV SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $110k → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $708k → 14%UNIV SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $43k → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $539k → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $103k → 14%OLIVE VIEW-UCLA EDUCATION & RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $34k → 14%OLIVE VIEW-UCLA EDUCATION & RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $31k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $114k → 14%RANCHO RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
OH
PA
RI
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $231k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$192k · 83% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT GENERAL OPERATIONS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$23k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT GENERAL OPERATIONS

Sub-Saharan Africa$16k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT GENERAL OPERATIONS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$8.5M
$881k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+35%

Still filing today

26%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $252k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
HealthEducationInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $890k · revenue +16%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $396k · revenue +65%
  • SC
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $244k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $506k · revenue +49%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $114k · revenue +31%
  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $103k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
8
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science

Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…

Education
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Mellon University; the most unlike its peers is Rancho Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $1,350,134 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $930,409 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISNOVADIGM THERAPEUTICS INC: $874,296 · OtherNOVADIGM THERAPEUTICS INCUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $555,657 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIAEASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $475,284 · OtherEASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOLTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA: $368,116 · OtherTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SAREGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $343,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $295,403 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $247,411 · Other+14 more: $1,438,841 · Other+14 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $889,602 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYDUKE UNIVERSITY: $506,134 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTrustees of Dartmouth College: $224,580 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $169,006 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $96,914 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $95,248 · Education+1 more: $10,048 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $396,386 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $114,055 · HealthOLIVE VIEW-UCLA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUE INC: $71,119 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $31,004 · Health+2 more: $19,930 · HealthTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $293,380 · InternationalSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS: $244,049 · Crime & LegalBROWN UNIVERSITY: $70,108 · Community Improvement
Other$6,878,801Education$1,991,532Health$632,494International$293,380Crime & Legal$244,049Community Improvement$70,108

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $889,602 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $506,134 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $396,386 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $293,380 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS: $244,049 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $224,580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $169,006 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $114,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $102,599 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $96,914 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $95,248 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVE VIEW-UCLA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUE INC: $71,119 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $70,108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $31,004 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS: $25,796 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRancho Research Institute: $18,054 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10,530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY NURSES ASSOCIATION: $10,048 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $9,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CROSSROADS ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE VIEW-UCLA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS ↗
  • Who funds Rancho Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yale UniversityCT13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yale University · California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-Ucla Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-Ucla Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $231k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-Ucla Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph