Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lumry Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$64kReligion$57kArts & Culture$37kPhilanthropy$32kInternational$19kHealth$18kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$708k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF DALLAS$4,378
TEMPLE EMANU-EL EDUCATION FUND$3,825
FRIENDS OF IDF$3,072
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTH$2,650
LOVERS LANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOUNDATION$2,000
EAST WEST MINISTRIES$2,000
VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER$1,250
LITERACY ACHIEVES$1,000
GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT$1,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$1,000
ARMY SCHOLARSHIP$1,000
TEXAS ALLERGY ASTHMA IMMUNOLOGY SOCIETY FUND$1,000
VOGEL ALCOVEJEWISH COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$999
B'NAI VAIL$650
FAMILY PLACE$518
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COVERING HOUSE: $500 → 11%VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $2k → 14%VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $1k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $1k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $1k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $585 → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $570 → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $558 → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $518 → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $70 → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $1k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $1k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $1k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$236k · 43 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
35

Total granted

$236k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+43%

Still filing today

47%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +76%
  • LL
    LOVERS LANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +144%
  • TF
    The Family Place
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • AS
    Army Scholarship Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +108%
  • AF
    ACAAI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
9
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Changeorg Charitable Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meds for Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/45
Grantees still filing
36/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF DALLAS: $31,888 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DALLASTEMPLE EMANU-EL EDUCATION FUND: $28,567 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL EDUCATION FUNDDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA DEVELOPMENT FUND: $21,260 · OtherDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA DEVELOPMENT FUNDFRIENDS OF IDF: $14,472 · OtherFRIENDS OF IDFTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $12,700 · OtherTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP FUNDTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $12,500 · OtherTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERINGLITERACY ACHIEVES: $8,000 · OtherDALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM AND CENTER: $7,200 · Other+43 more: $55,247 · Other+43 moreLOVERS LANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOUNDATION: $13,071 · ReligionLOVERS LAN…East-West Ministries International: $11,005 · ReligionEast-West …WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationArmy Scholarship Foundation Inc: $2,500 · EducationThe Conservative Jewish Day School of Dallas Inc: $1,537 · Education+3 more: $563 · EducationThe Family Place: $5,451 · Human ServicesGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT: $3,500 · Human ServicesVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE COVERING HOUSE: $500 · Human ServicesMEDS for Africa: $4,000 · HealthDCMS FOUNDATION: $1,650 · HealthPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $1,105 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $665 · HealthCraig Hospital Foundation: $520 · HealthMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $500 · HealthHEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMA ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthWashburn Center for Children: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 · Health+6 more: $1,030 · HealthPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $3,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of Art: $1,860 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE KATY TRAIL INC: $1,750 · EnvironmentDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,258 · Environment
Other$191,834Religion$24,076Education$19,600Human Services$12,451Health$11,370Arts & Culture$4,860Environment$3,008

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOVERS LANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOUNDATION: $13,071 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetThe Family Place: $5,451 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $4,525 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDS for Africa: $4,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $2,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetArmy Scholarship Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $1,860 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KATY TRAIL INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDCMS FOUNDATION: $1,650 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Conservative Jewish Day School of Dallas Inc: $1,537 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,258 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $1,105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $1,065 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $665 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMA ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashburn Center for Children: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COVERING HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTZU ZOO RESCUE: $355 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $304 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY SOCIETY INC: $280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAR FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERIOD INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $209 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHANGEORG CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $8 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOVERS LANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MEDS for Africa ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Army Scholarship Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE KATY TRAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds DCMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Conservative Jewish Day School of Dallas Inc ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX22.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Assurant Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lumry Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lumry Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Period Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lumry Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph