Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lumena Foundation a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182024.

Education$1.6MCivil Rights$715kEmployment$225kPublic Benefit$80kHuman Services$80kInternational$60kCrime & Legal$40kEnvironment$40kOther$35k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMEWORKS TRENTON$1,000,000
HOMEWORKS TRENTON$500,000
ELEVATED ACCESS INC$450,000
ELEVATED ACCESS INC$50,000
WOMENS BEAN PROJECT$40,000
BAIL PROJECT INC$20,000
NEO PHILANTHROPY INC$20,000
LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC$15,000
LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC$15,000
SISTER SONG INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHE SHOULD RUN: $25k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $20k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $10k → 14%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
TN
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-32%
+5%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalEmploymentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Elevated Access Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $550k · revenue +47% · 27% of their budget
  • WB
    WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT
    7× · 2018–2024 · $225k · revenue +65%
  • THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue ×11

Funded once

  • ADA DEVELOPERS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -25%
  • GIRLS WHO CODE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
B-Word Worldwide Inc Bitch Media

To provide and encourage an engaged, thoughtful feminist response to mainstream and popular culture.

2
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
3
Wereign Inc

Supporting black girls by creating safe places where they can strenghten their skills to become advocates activist and change agents in their community

Education
4
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
5
Blackfem Inc

Blackfem partners with the nation's most forward-thinking governmental bodies and activists to reimagine wealth building opportunities for black women.

Human Services
6
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
7
Bay Area Women Leader Network

How Women Lead elevates diverse women in the corporate, public, philanthropic, and and nonprofit sectors by cultivating a robust network that trains and connects women executives who are catalysts in their fields. We collectively donate to…

Human Services
8
Girls in Tech Inc

Girls in tech is a social networking enterprise focused on the engagement, education and empowerment of like-minded, professional, intelligent and influential women in technology fields around the world.

9
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
10
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
11
Girls Education Collaborative Inc

GEC partners with locally-led organizations to catalyze and support sustainable, community-driven solutions that remove social, economic, and gender-based barriers keeping girls out of school in under-resourced regions of the global south.

International
12
Leadership Women Inc

Leadership Womens mission is to ensure womens full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic, and public life.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc and the most unlike its peers is Elevated Access Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
5/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HomeWorks Trenton — $1,500,000 · EducationHomeWorks Trenton+2 more — $65,000 · EducationElevated Access Inc — $550,000 · Civil RightsElevated Access IncTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $105,000 · Civil RightsTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INCHigher Heights Leadership Fund — $60,000 · Civil RightsHigher Heights Leadership Fu…WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT — $225,000 · EmploymentNEO Philanthropy Inc — $80,000 · Public BenefitSHE SHOULD RUN — $55,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $60,000 · InternationalTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $40,000 · Crime & LegalHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $40,000 · OtherBROWN GIRLS DO INC — $35,000 · Other
Education$1,565,000Civil Rights$715,000Employment$225,000Public Benefit$80,000Human Services$80,000International$60,000Crime & Legal$40,000Other$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHomeWorks Trenton — $1,500,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetElevated Access Inc — $550,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT — $225,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $105,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHigher Heights Leadership Fund — $60,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN — $55,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN GIRLS DO INC — $35,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetADA DEVELOPERS ACADEMY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERSONG INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lumena Foundation a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • HomeWorks Trenton6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lumena Foundation a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Lumena Foundation a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph