Skip to content

· Public charity

Lumani Foundation

Provide educational support for students that need financial assistance to be able to afford an education.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$592k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $164,791, the rows itemized in this filing. The $174,461 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,670 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$16,324
Median grant
1
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Roeper School$52,080
Oakland University$34,048
Bright Horizons$22,464
Wayne State University$16,324
Oakland Community College$13,154
University of Michigan-Dearborn$10,000
Eastern Michigan University$8,500
Central Michigan University$8,221
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Brookfield Academy: $14k → 8%University of Michigan: $10k → 14%Central Michigan University: $8k → 19%Bright Horizons: $42k → 21%Brookfield Academy: $6k → 8%Eastern Michigan University: $9k → 14%Bright Horizons: $37k → 21%Lawrence Tech University: $18k → 8%Eastern Michigan University: $8k → 14%Bright Horizons: $22k → 21%Lawrence Tech University: $9k → 8%Bright Horizons: $21k → 21%Lawrence Tech University: $9k → 8%Wayne State University: $31k → 21%The Roeper School: $52k → 8%Wayne State University: $26k → 21%Oakland Community College: $13k → 8%Wayne State University: $24k → 21%The Roeper School: $33k → 8%Wayne State University: $16k → 21%Oakland University: $52k → 8%University of Michigan-Dearborn: $10k → 21%Oakland University: $47k → 8%Oakland University: $42k → 8%Oakland University: $34k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$571k · 8 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$571k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROEPER CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $85k · revenue +4%
  • LT
    LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $36k · revenue +19%
  • EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • OC
    OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $13k · revenue 0%
  • CM
    CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2025 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $175,393 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITYBRIGHT HORIZONS CHILDRENS CENTERS LLC DBA DISCOVERY PRESCHOO: $121,274 · OtherBRIGHT HORIZONS CHILDRENS CENTERS LLC DBA DISCOVERY PRESCHOOWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $96,574 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYROEPER CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $85,444 · OtherROEPER CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $20,000 · OtherBROOKFIELD ACADEMY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $19,850 · Other+1 more: $8,221 · OtherLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $36,000 · EducationLAWRENCE TEC…EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,131 · EducationEASTERN MICH…OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13,154 · EducationOAKLAND COMM…
Other$526,756Education$65,285

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROEPER CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $85,444 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,131 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13,154 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROEPER CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lumani Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lumani Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lumani’s filings →

    More from the funding graph