Skip to content

· Private foundation

Luke Manufacturing Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$47kHuman Services$22kScience & Tech$6kRecreation & Sports$3kHousing & Shelter$1kPhilanthropy$1kYouth Development$1kArts & Culture$550Other$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$450
Median grant
1
States reached
$104k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF WADSWORTH$9,200
WADSWORTH HIGH SCHOOL$5,966
SALVATION ARMY CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$5,000
RITTMAN EXENOTED VILLAGE SCHOOLS$3,000
BELLEFONTAINE CITY SCHOOLS$1,500
WADSWORTH CITY SCHOOLS$1,295
WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FUND$1,100
GIRL SCOUT TROOP 91108$726
Individual grant recipient$450
SALVATION ARMY$250
WADSWORTH ALL SPORT BOOSTERS$225
WADSWORTH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$200
RITTMAN HIGH SCHOOL$200
GREAT TRAIL BOY SCOUT COUNCIL$200
NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 15 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$58k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
+12%

Still filing today

20%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF WADSWORTH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue -88%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY CAPITAL CAMPAIGN
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k
  • WC
    WADSWORTH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • WH
    WADSWORTH HS FRESHMAN ACADEMY GRANT
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worthington Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote/improve business and stimulate growth

—
2
Wentworth Economic Development Corp

Founded for the sole purpose of promoting economic growth in the eastern lakes region

Community Improvement
3
Wadsworth Public Library Foundation

The Wadsworth Public Library Foundation was established to seek, receive and administer gifts, bequests and donations for the support and preservation of the Wadsworth Public Library, beyond the level of taxpayer responsibility and in a…

Education
4
Willoughby Western Lake County Chamber of Commerce

Promote business and economic development

—
5
Downtown Wadsworth Inc

To develop and maintain a downtown identity that will continually advance the quality of the community's social, cultural and commercial environment.

—
6
Wayne County Community Foundation

The foundation invests in the community by growing its endowment, encouraging philanthropy & innovation, supporting charitable activities, and assessing & addressing community needs.

Philanthropy
7
Massillon Weststark Chamber

The Massillon WestStark Chamber of Commerce exists to develop, enhance, and represent business, promote economic growth, and improve the quality of life for our community.

—
8
Wayne Economic Development Council Inc

To maximize the development and utilization of the human and economic resources of the wayne county georgraphical area in order to create or preserve jobs and employment opportunities and improve the welfare of people of the area.

—
9
Downtown Westfield Corporation

Establish Westfield as a preferred destination for people to want to live, work and visit.

Community Improvement
10
Wayne County Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promote, lead, unite, and serve members, businesses, and the community in order for wayne county to be a great place to live, learn, and do business.

—
11
Wethersfield Academic Foundation

The foundation is designed to enhance the educational opportunities within wethersfield community unit school district no 230.

Education
12
Winfield Area Chamber of Commerce

Advance the economic and community development of the winfield area through leadership, education, and advocacy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wayne County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rittman Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF WADSWORTH: $28,100 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF WADSWORTHSALVATION ARMY CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $20,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY CAPITAL CAMPAIGNWADSWORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $5,966 · OtherWADSWORTH HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherRITTMAN EXENOTED VILLAGE SCHOOLS: $3,000 · Other+29 more: $21,051 · Other+29 moreWADSWORTH YOUTH FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC: $1,600 · Recreation & SportsWAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,100 · PhilanthropyFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $200 · Human ServicesLeadership Medina County: $200 · Community ImprovementMEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC: $75 · Housing & ShelterINSPIRE AVIATION: $50 · Employment
Other$81,117Recreation & Sports$1,600Philanthropy$1,100Human Services$200Community Improvement$200Housing & Shelter$75Employment$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF WADSWORTH: $28,100 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetWADSWORTH YOUTH FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC: $1,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WADSWORTH OLDER ADULTS FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRITTMAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $250 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Medina County: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRE AVIATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF WADSWORTH ↗
  • Who funds WADSWORTH YOUTH FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WADSWORTH OLDER ADULTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RITTMAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Medina County ↗
  • Who funds MEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRE AVIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Luke Manufacturing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Luke Manufacturing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Luke Manufacturing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Luke Manufacturing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Luke Manufacturing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph