Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucile H Howe and Mitchell B Howe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$246kHousing & Shelter$174kAnimals$102kEducation$92kReligion$82kPhilanthropy$71kCivil Rights$25kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$704k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOOR OF HOPE$37,000
LEAD WITH YOUR LIFE$25,000
PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
LAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$10,000
GOODEN CENTER INC$10,000
THORSTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
SUNRISE HORSE RESCUE$5,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ST JUDES HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%ROAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ROAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ROAR FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $37k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $37k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $18k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $12k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $12k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $8k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $8k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $12k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%PASADENA GUILD CHOC: $10k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%MARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL: $8k → 14%MARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 14%PASADENA GUILD CHOC: $8k → 14%LEAD WITH YOUR LIFE: $25k → 14%DOOR OF HOPE: $37k → 14%INDIGENOUS WAYS: $25k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RES: $15k → 14%LAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 14%PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 14%LAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LEAD WITH YOUR LIFE: $10k → 14%LAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%GOODEN CENTER INC: $10k → 14%LEAD WITH YOUR LIFE: $10k → 14%HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INST: $10k → 14%LAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%LAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%GOODEN CENTER INC: $8k → 14%GOODEN CENTER INC: $8k → 14%GOODEN CENTER INC: $8k → 14%PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 14%PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$806k · 15 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -58% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$806k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-58%

Still filing today

60%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DOOR OF HOPE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $173k · revenue +369%
  • PH
    Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +25%
  • LW
    LEAD WITH YOUR LIFE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +200%

Funded once

  • IW
    INDIGENOUS WAYS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • HM
    HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pih Health Whittier Hospital

Mission: we provide high quality healthcare without discrimination, and contribute to the health and well-being of our communities in an ethical, safe, and fiscally prudent manner in recognition of our charitable purpose.

Health
2
Barlow Respiratory Hospital

A not-for-profit, long-term acute care specialty healthcare organization is to improve the quality of life for patients with respiratory and other diseases that may require prolonged acute hospitalization of specialized treatment.

Health
3
Adventist Health Medical Ctr Tehachapi dba Adventist Health Tehachapi Valley

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

—
4
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
5
Castle Medical Center dba Adventist Health Castle

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
6
St Helena Hospital

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
7
Simi Valley Hosp and Hlth Care Services dba Adventist Health Simi Valley

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
8
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
10
Hayward Sisters Hospital Dba St Rose Hospital

St Rose Hospital provides quality health care to our community with respect, compassion, and professionalism. We work in partnership with our highly valued physicians and employees to heal and comfort all those we serve.

Health
11
Jha Geriatric Services Inc

Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.

Health
12
Pih Health Downey Hospital

Mission: We provide high quality healthcare without discrimination and contribute to the health and well-being of our communities in an ethical, safe, and fiscally prudent manner in recognition of our charitable purpose.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pih Health Good Samaritan Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Sunrise Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOOR OF HOPE: $172,500 · OtherDOOR OF HOPELAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $71,000 · OtherLAKE AVENUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHORSTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherTHORSTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIGENOUS WAYS: $25,000 · OtherINDIGENOUS WAYSSHRINERS HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $16,000 · OtherPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $87,000 · HealthPasadena Hospital Association…THE GOODEN CENTER: $63,500 · HealthTHE GOODEN CENTERPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital: $45,000 · HealthPIH Health Good Samaritan Hos…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH H…HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $10,000 · HealthPASADENA HUMANE: $50,000 · AnimalsPASADENA HUMA…ROAR FOUNDATION: $47,000 · AnimalsROAR FOUNDATI…SUNRISE HORSE RESCUE: $5,000 · AnimalsLEAD WITH YOUR LIFE INC: $82,000 · ReligionLEAD WITH …MARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL: $35,000 · Education
Other$420,000Health$225,500Animals$102,000Religion$82,000Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $172,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $87,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEAD WITH YOUR LIFE INC: $82,000 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetTHE GOODEN CENTER: $63,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE: $50,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROAR FOUNDATION: $47,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
  • Who funds LEAD WITH YOUR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOODEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds ROAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital ↗
  • Who funds MARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE HORSE RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lucile H Howe and Mitchell B Howe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucile H Howe and Mitchell B Howe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lucile H Howe and Mitchell B Howe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lucile H Howe and Mitchell B Howe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lucile H Howe and Mitchell B Howe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph