Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucey Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$62kHousing & Shelter$45kYouth Development$39kHealth$39kHuman Services$34kFood & Nutrition$15kPublic Benefit$10kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK$11,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$8,100
SCELP$7,500
SOUTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENT$7,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,505
LANDMARK FOR FAMILIES$5,000
MY SISTERS HOUSE$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,098
NAACP$3,000
ONE80 PLACE$3,000
CAROLINA ABORTION FUND$3,000
PENN CENTER$3,000
INTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILD HELP: $330 → 11%CHILD HELP: $324 → 11%BLISSFUL DREAMS: $1k → 9%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%LANDMARK FOR FAMILIES: $5k → 12%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 12%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 12%LANDMARK FOR FAMILIES: $600 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$352k · 37 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
30

Total granted

$352k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

46%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +5%
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +55%
  • LF
    Landmarks for Families Inc
    5× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • PP
    PALMETTO PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +107%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • FB
    FLOWERTOWN BEE FARM
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charleston Legal Access

To expand access to legal representation and rights in South Carolina.

Crime & Legal
2
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
3
Mcleod Physician Associates Ii

Mcleod physician associates ii operates as a part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing…

Health
4
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
5
Palmetto Citizens Against Sexual Assault

Provides victims of sexual assault, attempted sexual assault and incest with immediate supportive care and information about medical legal proceedings, crisis counseling, and educational programs.

—
6
American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina Foundation Inc

At the aclu of south carolina foundation, we advocate, litigate, educate, and mobilize to defend and advance the civil rights and civil liberties of all south carolinians.

Civil Rights
7
South Carolina First Steps to School Readiness Board of Trustees

Per south carolina code section 59-152-30: "the goals for south carolina first steps to school readiness are to: (1) provide parents with access to the support they might seek and want to strengthen their families and to promote the…

Education
8
Care Share Health Alliance Inc

Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…

Health
9
South Carolina Cancer Alliance

The mission of the South Carolina Cancer Alliance(SCCA)is to reduce the impact of cancer on all South Carolinians.

—
10
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
Memphis Child Advocacy Center

The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childhelp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mt Pleasant Academy Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE: $47,000 · OtherCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUESCELP: $38,641 · OtherSCELPLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $23,031 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCSOUTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENT: $21,500 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTDELANCEY STREET FOUNDATION: $15,010 · OtherDELANCEY STREET FOUNDATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $10,000 · OtherPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $10,000 · OtherJONATHAN FOUNDATION: $9,575 · Other+47 more: $97,838 · Other+47 moreLandmarks for Families Inc: $21,625 · Human ServicesLandmarks fo…My Sister's House Inc: $19,400 · Human ServicesMy Sister's …+2 more: $1,654 · Human ServicesAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $26,200 · HealthAMERICAN …CAROLINA ABORTION FUND: $4,500 · HealthCAROLINA …ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 · HealthALZHEIMER…+3 more: $624 · HealthFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $21,393 · Housing & ShelterOne-Eighty Place: $8,400 · Housing & ShelterCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation: $7,000 · Crime & LegalDARKNESS TO LIGHT INC: $500 · Crime & LegalPalmetto State Abortion Fund: $4,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR FULL ACCEPTANCE: $3,500 · Civil RightsUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,546 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 · International
Other$272,595Human Services$42,679Health$33,324Housing & Shelter$29,793Crime & Legal$7,500Civil Rights$7,500International$6,546

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $26,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $23,031 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLandmarks for Families Inc: $21,625 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $21,393 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetMy Sister's House Inc: $19,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEast Cooper Habitat for Humanity Inc: $8,530 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOne-Eighty Place: $8,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,546 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA ABORTION FUND: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPalmetto State Abortion Fund: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR FULL ACCEPTANCE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEETING STREET SCHOOLS: $1,044 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Pleasant Academy PTA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANSIDE COLLEGIATE ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATTISON'S ACADEMY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $654 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARKNESS TO LIGHT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $274 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStudents Care Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Landmarks for Families Inc ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC ↗
  • Who funds My Sister's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds PALMETTO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds East Cooper Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
  • Who funds One-Eighty Place ↗
  • Who funds Center for Heirs' Property Preservation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Palmetto State Abortion Fund ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR FULL ACCEPTANCE ↗
  • Who funds Penn Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Daniel Island Community Fund Inc · The Joanna Foundation · The Mark Elliott Motley Foundation Inc · Kuznik Charitable Foundation · Post and Courier Foundation · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Trident United Way · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lucey Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucey Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lucey’s filings →

More from the funding graph