Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucas Wegmann Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$685kArts & Culture$333kRecreation & Sports$195kReligion$85kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$371k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
DAPONTE STRING QUARTET FOUNDATION$50,000
CHORUS OF WESTERLY$50,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BOSTON SAENGERFEST MEN'S CHORUS: $15k → 7%HANDEL & HAYDN SCHOOL: $25k → 16%TRAIL LIFE USA: $150k → 15%CHORUS OF WESTERLY: $50k → 11%COLLEGE BAPTIST CHURCH: $50k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $250k → 14%AMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%THE CHORUS OF WESTERLY: $51k → 7%THE CHOIR SCHOOL OF NEWPORT COUNTY: $40k → 7%TRAIL LIFE: $50k → 14%AMERICAN BOYCHOIR SCHOOL: $10k → 11%COVINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 11%JOSEPH AND ALICE MCKEEN STUDY CENTER: $35k → 7%MIDCOAST HUMANE: $5k → 9%HANDEL & HAYDN SCHOOL: $9k → 16%TRAIL LIFE USA: $25k → 15%CHORUS OF WESTERLY: $10k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $200k → 14%THE CHORUS OF WESTERLY: $15k → 7%THE CHOIR SCHOOL OF NEWPORT COUNTY: $5k → 7%TRAIL LIFE: $50k → 14%DAPONTE STRING QUARTET FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%TRAIL LIFE USA: $20k → 15%CHORUS OF WESTERLY: $3k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $125k → 14%ST MARY SCHOLARSHIP: $10k → 7%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $40k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $25k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
MI
MA
NJ
RI
KY
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$503k · 6 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1090% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$503k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1090%
+31%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TRAIL LIFE USA
    3× · 2018–2023 · $195k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k
  • TC
    The Chorus of Westerly Inc
    2× · 2017–2023 · $66k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • AO
    AMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +31%
  • CB
    COLLEGE BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • JA
    Joseph and Alice McKeen Study Center
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Andover Choral Society Inc

Bringing classical music to the Merrimac Valley

—
2
Convivium Musicum

Educate member-singers and the public through the performance of renaissance choral music

Arts & Culture
3
Down East Singers

Down East Singers is a musical organization specifically incorporated to create opportunities for participation and enrichment for community members, to perform quality choral music under professional leadership, and to bring affordable…

Arts & Culture
4
Nielsen Chorale
Arts & Culture
5
Brookline Chorus Inc

Our mission is to unite vocal musicians who share the joy of learning and performing diverse repertoire. Our varied programming is designed to engage and inspire both performers and audience members. We are committed to building a richer,…

Arts & Culture
6
Wellesley Choral Society

Our purpose is to study and perform the world's great choral music

Arts & Culture
7
Longfellow Chorus

The Corporation shall organize and maintain a chorus to perform and record vocal and choral settings of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's poetry, written from 1840 to the present, shall inspire and commission new vocal and choral settings of…

Arts & Culture
8
The Choristers of Upper Dublin

Performance of choral music

—
9
Una Voce Chamber Choir

VISION: Every community, regardless of geography, population, or wealth, has the right to fully experience the breadth and vibrancy of the modern choral tradition, and the fruits of our shared cultural inheritance. MISSION STATEMENT: Una…

Arts & Culture
10
Jameson Singers Inc

choral performances

Arts & Culture
11
Beckridge Chorale

Arts Education

Arts & Culture
12
Monmouth Civic Chorus Inc

The Monmouth Civic Chorus presents concerts of classical music for audiences in New Jersey and beyond.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chorus of Westerly Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $660,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGETRAIL LIFE USA: $195,000 · OtherTRAIL LIFE USAIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Chorus of Westerly Inc: $65,650 · OtherThe Chorus of Westerly IncCHORUS OF WESTERLY: $63,000 · OtherCHORUS OF WESTERLYCOLLEGE BAPTIST CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherCOLLEGE BAPTIST CHURCHDAPONTE STRING QUARTET FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherDAPONTE STRING QUARTET FOUNDATIONCHOIR SCHOOL OF NEWPORT COUNTY INC: $45,000 · OtherCHOIR SCHOOL OF NEWPORT COUNTY INCHANDEL & HAYDN SCHOOL: $34,000 · OtherCOVINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SAENGERFEST MENS CHORUS INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureJoseph and Alice McKeen Study Center: $35,000 · ReligionMIDCOAST HUMANE: $5,000 · Animals
Education$660,000Other$647,650Arts & Culture$65,000Religion$35,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $660,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Chorus of Westerly Inc: $65,650 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJoseph and Alice McKeen Study Center: $35,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetBOSTON SAENGERFEST MENS CHORUS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetMIDCOAST HUMANE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Chorus of Westerly Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAPONTE STRING QUARTET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHOIR SCHOOL OF NEWPORT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Joseph and Alice McKeen Study Center ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SAENGERFEST MENS CHORUS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDCOAST HUMANE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lucas Wegmann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucas Wegmann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lucas Wegmann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph