· Private foundation
Lrca Peterson Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $195k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HopeWorks | $18,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,000 |
| FareStart | $18,000 |
| Anacortes Family Center | $15,000 |
| Underground Ministries | $15,000 |
| Chinook Enterprises | $14,000 |
| ATTIC | $13,000 |
| Ventures | $12,000 |
| Pioneer Human Services | $12,000 |
| YWCA | $10,000 |
| The Salvation Army | $10,000 |
| Bridgeways | $10,000 |
| Evergreen Goodwill | $10,000 |
| Family Promise | $10,000 |
| Sherwood Community Services | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UMUNDERGROUND MINISTRIES3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +87%
- BBridgeways6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +98%
- SVSkagit Valley College Foundation2× · 2021–2022 · $37k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- EGEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +51%
- HHHelping Handsone grant, 2023 · $900
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
At Solid Ground, we work passionately to end poverty and build a more equitable community. Our services support people experiencing poverty by helping them achieve stability and expand their skills to realize their dreams. And that's just…
To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served
Se works' mission is to strengthen the economic health and well being of our diverse community by facilitating successful connections between job seekers and employers.
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
The east cascades workforce investment board supports the talent needs of employers, and maximizes and aligns investments in the career goals of individuals to fuel a thriving economy.
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.
Workforce snohomish invests government and private funding to continuously increase the global competitiveness and prosperity of our businesses and workforce, to fill current and emerging jobs, and to provide full employment. our…
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pioneer Human Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love in the Name of Christ of Mason County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds VENTURES ↗
- Who funds ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNDERGROUND MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds Bridgeways ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Skagit Valley College Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHINOOK ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SKAGIT VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MULTI-SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds New Earth Recovery ↗
- Who funds Love in the Name of Christ of Mason County ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Skagit Community Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Medina Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Seattle Foundation · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Jerry H Walton Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lrca Peterson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lrca Peterson Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lrca Peterson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.