Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lpr Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$184kEnvironment$31kFood & Nutrition$22kYouth Development$21kRecreation & Sports$19kEducation$7kHealth$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
$7,244
Median grant
4
States reached
$40k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REUNITE THE FIGHT$30,857
J & S OUTDOORS LLC$7,244
BRAMFORD ELEMENTARY ANNUAL GOLF TOURNAMENT$4,999
AFTER SCHOOL FOR KIDS$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 3% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ABEL STEELE FABRICATORS: $1k → 11%J & S OUTDOORS LLC: $7k → 14%NCCER SCHOLARSHIP FUNDHRCC: $500 → 19%REUNITE THE FIGHT: $38k → 13%REUNITE THE FIGHT INC: $5k → 21%NORTH JACKSON HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 16%COOPER ACADEMY PTA: $5k → 10%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 7%COLORADO COUGARS: $600 → 8%WELD COUNTY FOOD BANK: $200 → 9%COLORADO CLAYS: $10k → 10%LARIMER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $13k → 11%AISC EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 14%MISSISSIPPI ELITE 2023: $5k → 15%AFTER SCHOOL FOR KIDS: $300 → 10%REUNITE THE FIGHT: $35k → 13%HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION: $1k → 8%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1k → 9%COLORADO CLAYS: $5k → 10%LARIMER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $8k → 11%REUNITE THE FIGHT: $31k → 13%NORTHERN COLORADO UNITED FOR YOUTH: $7k → 9%THOMPSON VALLEY ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%REUNITE THE FIGHT: $30k → 13%NORTHERN COLORADO UNITED FOR YOUTH: $550 → 9%LOVELAND BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%REUNITE THE FIGHT: $28k → 13%NOCO UNIFY: $550 → 9%BRAMFORD ELEMENTARY ANNUAL GOLF TOURNAMENT: $5k → 11%REUNITE THE FIGHT: $14k → 13%NOCO UNIFY: $550 → 9%NOCO BASEBALL INC: $1k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN RUSH SOFTBALL: $500 → 11%SIERRA'S RACE AGAINST MENINGITIS: $500 → 11%CROSSROADS CHURCH: $300 → 11%JKYLEADVENTURES: $3k → 11%SHOOTING SPORTS: $601 → 11%ROCKY MTN SHOOTERS: $9k → 11%ROCKY MTN SHOOTERS: $6k → 11%COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS: $13k → 11%COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS: $6k → 11%COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS: $6k → 11%KIDS AT HEART: $3k → 11%COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS: $6k → 11%SYC COLORADO INC: $1k → 11%VOICES CARRY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1k → 11%TEAM WELLNESS AND PREVENTION: $1k → 11%STRING GIRLS DIAMOND SPORTS CLUB: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
WY
CO
AZ
KS
NC
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$274k · 7 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +194% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
25

Total granted

$274k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+194%
+11%

Still filing today

57%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionPublic BenefitEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    REUNITE THE FIGHT INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $182k · revenue +88%
  • CY
    COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST
    4× · 2017–2020 · $31k · revenue +194%
  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer County
    2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • ME
    MISSISSIPPI ELITE 2023
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CA
    COOPER ACADEMY PTA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
2
Colorado Rage Baseball
Recreation & Sports
3
Colorado Diamonds

Youth Sports Activities

Youth Development
4
Youth & Family Connections Co Trestle Inc

Youth and Family Connections provides youth and families resources and alternatives that lead to a successful life.

Human Services
5
Foothills Food Bank

The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.

6
Colorado Juvenile Defender Center Dba Transformative Justice Proj of Colo

Ensuring excellence in juvenile defense

Human Services
7
Logan Youth Football Association
Philanthropy
8
Fraser Valley Lacrosse Club

FVLC is a sport club bringing lacrosse to a rural colorado community.

Recreation & Sports
9
Southern Colorado Youth Development

Support for at-risk youth in the community

Recreation & Sports
10
Firecrackers Dfw Worley

This organization is a youth travel softball team

Recreation & Sports
11
Feeding Our Community Ourselves Inc

Build community by providing nutritious and delicious meals to the people of Fort Collins regardless of their ability to pay while using mostly local, organic, and sustainably grown ingredients

Food & Nutrition
12
Tahoe Youth Sports Development
Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sierras Race Against Meningitis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REUNITE THE FIGHT INC — $181,599 · Public BenefitREUNITE THE FIGHT INCIndividual grant recipient — $15,520 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $14,860 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJ & S OUTDOORS LLC — $7,244 · OtherJ & S OUTDOORS LLCBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $5,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAMISSISSIPPI ELITE 2023 — $5,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI ELITE 2023COOPER ACADEMY PTA — $5,000 · OtherCOOPER ACADEMY PTAIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRAMFORD ELEMENTARY ANNUAL GOLF TOURNAMENT — $4,999 · OtherBRAMFORD ELEMENTARY ANNUAL …JKYLEADVENTURES — $3,265 · Other+19 more — $14,401 · Other+19 moreCOLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST — $31,200 · EnvironmentCOLORADO Y…The Food Bank for Larimer County — $21,877 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $200 · Food & NutritionNorthern Colorado United for Youth — $7,550 · Youth DevelopmentTHOMPSON VALLEY ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Community ImprovementKids At Heart — $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Public Benefit$181,599Other$80,289Environment$31,200Food & Nutrition$22,077Youth Development$7,550Community Improvement$5,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREUNITE THE FIGHT INC — $181,599 over 7y, 19% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST — $31,200 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $21,877 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorthern Colorado United for Youth — $7,550 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CRAWFORD CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRAS RACE AGAINST MENINGITIS — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REUNITE THE FIGHT INC
  • Who funds COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST
  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County
  • Who funds Northern Colorado United for Youth
  • Who funds THOMPSON VALLEY ROTARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Kids At Heart
  • Who funds THE CRAWFORD CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds SIERRAS RACE AGAINST MENINGITIS
  • Who funds THE STING GIRLS DIAMOND SPORTS CLUB
  • Who funds WELD FOOD BANK
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lpr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lpr Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lpr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph