· Public charity
Loxahatchee Club Educational Foundation
The LOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION is focused on expanding educational opportunities within our own community of employees and their families and within the greater community of jupiter.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $139,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $323,327 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $184,227 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $123k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TSIC INC | $32,000 |
| JUPITER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $23,000 |
| HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC | $21,600 |
| EDNA W RUNNER TUTORIAL CENTER | $20,000 |
| EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE CENTER | $14,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC | $12,000 |
| GRACE NOTES MUSIC FOUNDATION INC | $9,000 |
| LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $174k · revenue +65%
- LALIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +18%
- ESEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- CFCOLLEGE FOR KIDS INCone grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue -15%
- JAJunior Achievement of the Palm Beaches & Treasure Coast Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +27%
- EFELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +109%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our volunteer-delivered programs give the students knowledge and skills in financial literacy, workforce readiness and entrepreneurship. Junior Achievement helps to enhance the relevance and value of school for students.
The milagro foundation, inc., dba the milagro center (the center) is a not-for-profit corporation established in 1997 whose mission is to enrich the lives of children through cultural arts, living values and academic support. the center's…
Tuition free public charter school serving students in kindergarten - 5th grade, and including a pre-kindergarten classroom as well. our ultimate goal is for our students to not only be successful in school, but to be successful in life.
To teach the mind, reach the heart, and inspire servant leaders who impact the world for jesus christ.
Junior achievement of southwest florida is a nonprofit dedicated to inspiring and preparing young people for success.
Step up for students empowers families to pursue and engage in the most appropriate learning options for their children, with an emphasis on families who lack the information and financial resources to access these options. by pursuing…
Miami children's museum is a non-profit educational institution, which meets the needs of all children in our multicultural community. visitors of all ages are encouraged to play together, learn, imagine, and create. the museum offers…
Provide services and programs for women, teens, children, and families of miami-dade county in focusing our mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
Early learning childcare
To strenghten and instill pride in family and community through the development of programs and institutions that cultivate self-development, teach self-disipline, build confidence and promote cutural awareness.
To operate a not-for-profit charter school and to conduct educational development activities.
Miami music project uses music as an instrument for social transformation, empowering children to acquire values and achieve their full potential, positively affecting their society through the study and performance of music. our vision is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Jupiter Community Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grace Notes Music Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC ↗
- Who funds El Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE NOTES MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST JUPITER COMMUNITY GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of the Palm Beaches & Treasure Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Frenchmans Creek Charities Foundation Inc · Ballenisles Charities Foundation Inc · The Mirasol Foundation Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Loxahatchee Club Educational Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hope Rural School Inc — 6% of income from government
- Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children — 0% of income from government
- Lighthouse Artcenter Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Loxahatchee Club Educational Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Loxahatchee Club Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.