Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lowry Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0153% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$40kCommunity Improvement$30kCivil Rights$12kScience & Tech$11kInternational$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPhilanthropy$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$8,430
Median grant
1
States reached
$129k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS UNDER 100000$8,430
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRAGMENT SOCIETY: $3k → 7%EASTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4k → 11%VOLUNTEER CENTER SANTA CRUZ: $4k → 13%NRDC: $25k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%ROTARY CLUB: $2k → 11%ACLU FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA: $10k → 18%DESIGN OUTREACH: $1k → 15%PARTNERS FOR WORLD HEALTH: $2k → 7%FRAGMENT SOCIETY: $2k → 7%SANTA CRUZ ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 13%NRDC: $5k → 17%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $23k → 11%ACLU ALABAMA: $2k → 18%PARTNERS FOR WORLD HEALTH: $1k → 7%SANTA CRUZ ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 13%NRDC: $5k → 17%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $11k → 11%ACLU ALABAMA: $2k → 18%PARTNERS FOR WORLD HEALTH: $1k → 7%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $9k → 11%ACLU ALABAMA: $2k → 18%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $8k → 11%ACLU ALABAMA: $2k → 18%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $8k → 11%ACLU FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA: $2k → 18%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $8k → 11%ACLU ALABAMA: $1k → 18%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $6k → 11%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $6k → 11%VARIOUS UNDER 100000: $5k → 11%HUNTSVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $3k → 11%HUNTSVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2k → 11%HUNTSVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2k → 11%HUNTSVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1k → 11%HUNTSVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1k → 11%HUNTSVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1k → 11%HUDSON ALPHA FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HUDSON ALPHA FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$208k · 11 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$208k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+228%

Still filing today

55%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +26%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ALABAMA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +83%
  • TF
    THE FRAGMENT SOCIETY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $5k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • VC
    VOLUNTEER CENTER SANTA CRUZ
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • EH
    EASTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +228%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation Earth

Foster an earth-centered worldview and economy.

Environment
2
Synchronicity Earth Usa Inc

Raise awareness about the issue, science, and solutions behind the world ecological crisis. the principal activity of the corporation is raising money to support the charitable activities of synchronicity earth in the united kingdom, which…

Environment
3
World Future Society

The world future society works to improve decision-making about the future by empowering futurists, fostering networks and advancing knowledge and action on future critical issues.

4
World Health Foundation

We are supporting health initiatives worldwide.

Health
5
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
6
Humanitarian China

Provide humanitarian support in China. Help to develop a civil society in China. Promote rule-of-law,human rights, and freedom of expressions.Focus on grass-root and people who are neglected by the outside world

International
7
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
8
Advocates for World Health Inc

Advocates for world health is a nonprofit that recovers and redistributes medical products to reduce waste and improve healthcare in the u.s. and abroad.

International
9
Global Health Foundation Inc

Global Health Foundation supports innovative solutions to improve the health and livelihoods of people living in resource-poor communities around the world.

10
Ecological Rights Foundation

The mission of this organization shall be to educate the general public about environmental practices which cause harm to human health, the environment and other natural resources; and to seek redress of these harms through litigation or…

Environment
11
Engineers Without Borders- International

EWB International seeks to promote collaboration of the global EWB movement. Together we work towards a sustainable world, where engineering enables long-term positive social and economic development, for the benefit of people and the…

International
12
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Fragment Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS UNDER 100000 — $83,903 · OtherVARIOUS UNDER 100000ROTARY CLUB — $29,980 · OtherROTARY CLUBIndividual grant recipient — $10,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $9,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more — $9,600 · Other+3 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DE…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ALABAMA FOUNDATION — $12,000 · Civil RightsHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION — $11,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 · InternationalPartners for World Health — $3,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,100 · InternationalTHE FRAGMENT SOCIETY — $4,750 · PhilanthropyDESIGN OUTREACH INC — $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$143,033Environment$40,000Civil Rights$12,000Education$11,000International$9,600Philanthropy$4,750Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ALABAMA FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRAGMENT SOCIETY — $4,750 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetEASTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $3,600 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetPartners for World Health — $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESIGN OUTREACH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ALABAMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds THE FRAGMENT SOCIETY
  • Who funds EASTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Partners for World Health
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds DESIGN OUTREACH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lowry Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lowry Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lowry Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph