Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lowen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$132kReligion$126kHuman Services$114kCivil Rights$104kArts & Culture$99kInternational$95kRecreation & Sports$51kHealth$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$27,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$16,000
TEMPLE BETH AM$10,230
HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOC OF WA STATE$5,176
ACLU FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON$5,000
ARTS FUND$5,000
HOLOCAUST CENTER FOR HUMANITY$5,000
URJ CAMP KALSMAN$4,000
NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION$3,800
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$3,500
FRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$3,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$3,000
CCF CAMBODIAN CHILDRENS FUND$2,800
CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY$2,000
HILLEL FOUNDATION UW$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $16k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $14k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $11k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $11k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $7k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
MI
NY
CT
CA
VA
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$962k · 43 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
8

Total granted

$962k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+71%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsInternationalHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +107%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +46%
  • A
    ARTSFUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +356%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +110%
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • LA
    Listen and Talkgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $800 · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Washington

To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights, and to take action to further those liberties and rights within the state of washington.

—
2
Association of American Law Schools Inc

The association of american law schools' mission is to uphold and advance excellence in legal education.

Education
3
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
6
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
7
Aclu of Washington Endowment Fund

To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights by supporting the aclu-wa foundation.

—
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
American Society of International Law

To foster the study of international law and to promote international relations on the basis of law and justice.

International
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Civil Liberties Union of Washington Found; the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
28/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BETH AM: $108,291 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AMIndividual grant recipient: $97,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $51,000 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMHolocaust Center For Humanity: $28,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $24,000 · Other+29 more: $190,766 · Other+29 moreCollege Success Foundation: $55,000 · EducationCollege Succe…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $48,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER: $14,000 · EducationFRIENDS WITHO…+1 more: $800 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $90,075 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAM…American Civil Liberties Union of Washington Found: $55,500 · Civil RightsAmerican …ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $13,500 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFA…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $13,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …International Rescue Committee INC: $23,000 · InternationalNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $14,300 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $14,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalARTSFUND: $32,500 · Arts & CultureCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $8,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE THEATRE GROUP: $8,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$579,007Education$117,800Human Services$90,075Civil Rights$87,500International$66,300Arts & Culture$48,500Crime & Legal$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $90,075 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Washington Found: $55,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCollege Success Foundation: $55,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARTSFUND: $32,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity: $28,250 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $24,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington: $17,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS: $15,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $14,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMaris Place: $14,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $13,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKing County Sexual Assault Resource Center: $11,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKline Galland Center Foundation: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFARESTART: $8,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE THEATRE GROUP: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST PLACE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINDERING CENTER: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKline Galland Center: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetListen and Talk: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Washington Found ↗
  • Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTSFUND ↗
  • Who funds Holocaust Center For Humanity ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Hillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds King County Sexual Assault Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds Kline Galland Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA21.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Lott Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Sheri and Les Biller Family Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lowen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lowen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lowen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lowen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lowen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph