Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lowell N Johnson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$744k
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.5MHuman Services$472kReligion$251kHealth$250kYouth Development$186kArts & Culture$150kCrime & Legal$110kAnimals$87kOther$0
02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $195k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $350k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$6,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Moline School District 40$139,500
YMCA$60,000
Christ Church$25,000
University of Illinois$25,000
Sherrard Grade School$23,500
Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island$22,000
EveryChild$20,000
Blackhawk College$20,000
Western Illinois University$20,000
Augustana College$20,000
St Ambrose University$20,000
Mercer County Intermediate School$16,000
Junior Achievement$15,000
St Paul Lutheran Church Orion$15,000
Moline Rotary Literacy Committee$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $22k → 15%Project Now: $5k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $2k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $2k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $2k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $2k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $2k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $2k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Rock Island: $2k → 15%W Butterworth Foundation: $22k → 15%W Butterworth Foundation: $12k → 15%W Butterworth Foundation: $12k → 15%W Butterworth Foundation: $12k → 15%W Butterworth Foundation: $9k → 15%W Butterworth Foundation: $3k → 15%W Butterworth Foundation: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 81 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
9

Total granted

$4.4M
$61k

Still filing today

19%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AUGUSTANA COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +27%
  • E
    EVERYCHILD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +109%
  • SA
    ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $19k
  • RI
    Rock Island School District
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • JD
    Juvenile Diabetes
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
5
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
6
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
7
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
Trinity Medical Center

The mission of trinity medical center is to improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Unity Healthcare

The mission of trinity-muscatine is to improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is William Butterworth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Moline School District 40: $575,300 · OtherMoline School District 40Western Illinois University: $228,366 · OtherWestern Illinois UniversityUniversity of Illinois: $182,767 · OtherYMCA: $182,500 · OtherBlackhawk College: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $125,000 · Other+72 more: $2,261,000 · Other+72 moreAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $182,867 · EducationST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $103,400 · EducationEVERYCHILD: $150,000 · Crime & LegalWILLIAM BUTTERWORTH FOUNDATION: $72,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ROCK ISLAND CO: $32,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT NOW INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTRINITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthQUAD CITIES AUTISM CENTER: $27,000 · HealthMERCER FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH: $23,000 · HealthPUTNAM MUSEUM AND SCIENCE CENTER: $37,500 · Arts & CultureThe Deanery School of Music: $10,000 · Arts & CultureABILITIES PLUS: $26,000 · EmploymentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,729,933Education$286,267Crime & Legal$150,000Human Services$109,500Health$90,000Arts & Culture$47,500Employment$26,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $182,867 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYCHILD: $150,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $103,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM BUTTERWORTH FOUNDATION: $72,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBradley M Yusim Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetPUTNAM MUSEUM AND SCIENCE CENTER: $37,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ROCK ISLAND CO: $32,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetQUAD CITIES AUTISM CENTER: $27,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetABILITIES PLUS: $26,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW KINGDOM TRAILRIDERS: $24,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetMERCER FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH: $23,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $19,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetThe Deanery School of Music: $10,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPROJECT NOW INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EVERYCHILD ↗
  • Who funds ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM BUTTERWORTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bradley M Yusim Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PUTNAM MUSEUM AND SCIENCE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Churchill Family Charitable FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Churchill Family Charitable Foundation · The Rock Island Community Foundation · Moline Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Grant & Virginia Brissman Foundation Nfp · Rauch Family Foundation I Inc · Doris & Victor Day Foundation Inc · Scott County Regional Authority · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Marie H Bechtel Charitable Trust · United Way Quad Cities · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lowell N Johnson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lowell N Johnson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lowell N Johnson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lowell N Johnson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lowell N Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph