Skip to content
Love X Foundation LLC at a glance

· Private foundation

Love X Foundation LLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Human Services$321kHealth$278kSocial Science$50kAnimals$27kHousing & Shelter$15kPublic Benefit$6kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$2k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES$100,000
THE ARLINGTON INSTITUTE$50,000
TEXAS RAMP PROJECT$15,000
COMAL COUNTY CRISIS CENTER$10,500
FRIENDS OF DOGS RESCUE$10,000
CANYON LAKE ANIMAL SHELTER SOCIETY$6,790
HUMANE SOCIETY OF KERRVILLE$2,000
STEPS FOR LIFE$2,000
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HALF A MILLION KIDS: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$525k · 6 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$525k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesReligionPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $148k · revenue +96%
  • MR
    MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $125k · revenue +16%
  • CL
    Canyon Lake Animal Shelter Society
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • HA
    HALF A MILLION KIDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • DA
    DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECTS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Als Worldwide

ALS Worldwide brings guidance, compassion and hope to thousands of ALS patients and their families in more than 150 countries. ALS Worldwide fills a unique niche of free counseling and information for people living with ALS/MND via…

Health
2
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
3
Furever Friends Rescue

Adoption services for orphaned pets

—
4
Vermont English Bulldog Rescue Inc

Dog rescue from kill shelters in san antonio and other places, rescuing puppies from kill shelters, to vermont for rehabilitation and adoptions. fixing and spaying dogs and providing all up to date treatments and vaccinated and have…

Animals
5
Paws Need People

Paws need people strive to rescue pets from shelters and provide a place they can stay until they are adopted. they provide pets to veterans through its therapy pet program.

—
6
Pets Return Home

The organization seeks to reduce the unecessary killing and suffering of healthy adoptable dogs at animal rescue and shelter organizations

Animals
7
Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

Animals
8
Journeys End Animal Sanctuary Inc

Animal Sanctuary

Animals
9
Mulligan Animal Rescue Inc

Rescue animals that would not otherwise be given a chance

Animals
10
New Hope for Adopted International Kids

Help struggling families and children who have been adopted from international families in other countries work to adjust to their new life and bring some into other families

Human Services
11
Promise 4 Paws

We are dedicated to rescuing homeless animals, rehabilitating and finding them permanent loving homes. We provide the highest standards of veterinary care and place them in nurturing foster homes until they are adopted.

Animals
12
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Road Ministries; the most unlike its peers is The Arlington Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMAL COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $221,466 · OtherCOMAL COUNTY CRISIS CENTERTHE ARLINGTON INSTITUTE: $50,000 · OtherTHE ARLINGTON INSTITUTEDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $25,000 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANSWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECTS: $25,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECTS+4 more: $22,266 · Other+4 moreHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $147,500 · HealthHEARTGIFT FOUNDATIONMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $125,000 · ReligionMISSION ROAD MINISTR…HALF A MILLION KIDS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCanyon Lake Animal Shelter Society: $15,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF KERRVILLE: $2,000 · AnimalsTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterWreaths Across America: $5,750 · Public Benefit
Other$343,732Health$147,500Religion$125,000Human Services$50,000Animals$17,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Public Benefit$5,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $147,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $125,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetTHE ARLINGTON INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCanyon Lake Animal Shelter Society: $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetWreaths Across America: $5,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOWEN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTEAMABILITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF KERRVILLE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Love X Foundation LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Love X Foundation LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Love X Foundation LLC?

    Find your warmest path to Love X Foundation LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Love X Foundation LLC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home