Skip to content
Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault Inc

Work toward ending sexual violence through education, program support, and social change

$891k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$208k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MHuman Services$1.0MCrime & Legal$985k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $813k
$112,928
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLSPRING$208,137
STAR$202,757
ADAPT$136,050
HEARTS OF HOPE$112,928
NEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE$85,540
THE HAVEN$67,638
METROPOLITAN CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHI$49,305
OASIS A SAFE HAVEN$29,038
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1000k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 21%ADAPT: $136k → 23%The Wellspring Counseling and Family Dev: $61k → 24%PROJECT CELEBRATION: $53k → 26%ADAPT: $122k → 23%The Wellspring Counseling and Family Dev: $38k → 24%PROJECT CELEBRATION: $42k → 26%ADAPT: $66k → 23%The Wellspring Counseling and Family Dev: $30k → 24%ADAPT Inc: $23k → 23%WELLSPRING: $208k → 24%ADAPT Inc: $12k → 23%WELLSPRING: $155k → 24%WELLSPRING: $53k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$3.1M
$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SEXUAL TRAUMA AWARENESS & RESPONSE CENTER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $552k · revenue +40%
  • TW
    THE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $546k · revenue +67%
  • HO
    HEARTS OF HOPE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $523k · revenue +35%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

    Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

    —
    2
    Northstar Advocacy Center

    This center brings victims of domestic violence and sexual assault together to provide a safe and nurturing place to learn and grow through crisis and case management, court advocacy, support groups and 24 hour crisis hotline.

    Human Services
    3
    Hush No More

    We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.

    Health
    4
    The Family Resource Center

    Support services victims of rape and sexual abuse

    —
    5
    Abuse Resource Network

    Support services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault & other crimes. we serve city and rural populations - men - women & children.

    —
    6
    Asap Association for Sexual Abuse Prevention and Treatment C/O Roth & Co
    Human Services
    7
    Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

    To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

    Human Services
    8
    Stopdv

    Special team on the prevention of domestic violence

    Crime & Legal
    9
    Response Inc

    Prevention of domestic violence

    Crime & Legal
    10
    Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

    Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

    —
    11
    Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

    Rape crisis and abuse shelter

    —
    12
    Project Against Violent Encounters

    Offering support services through a telephone hotline, temporary housing and various other services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sexual Trauma Awareness & Response Center; the most unlike its peers is Adapt Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC: $545,719 · Human ServicesTHE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INCAdapt Inc: $358,583 · Human ServicesAdapt IncNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $307,352 · Human ServicesNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCEMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC: $206,581 · Human ServicesMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INCOASIS - A SAFE HAVEN FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $126,171 · Human ServicesOASIS - A SAFE HAVEN FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOL…PROJECT CELEBRATION INC: $95,544 · Human ServicesPROJECT CELEBRATION INCSEXUAL TRAUMA AWARENESS & RESPONSE CENTER: $552,049 · HealthSEXUAL TRAUMA AWARENESS & R…The Haven Inc: $137,512 · HealthThe Haven IncST LANDRY-EVANGELINE SEXUAL ASSAULT: $63,230 · HealthST LANDRY-EVANGELINE SEXUAL…HEARTS OF HOPE: $523,433 · Crime & LegalHEARTS OF HOPENew Orleans Family Justice Al: $118,125 · OtherTHIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY: $36,073 · Other
    Human Services$1,639,950Health$752,791Crime & Legal$523,433Other$154,198

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEXUAL TRAUMA AWARENESS & RESPONSE CENTER: $552,049 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetTHE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC: $545,719 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetHEARTS OF HOPE: $523,433 over 6y, 13% of budgetAdapt Inc: $358,583 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $307,352 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC: $206,581 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetThe Haven Inc: $137,512 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetOASIS - A SAFE HAVEN FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $126,171 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetPROJECT CELEBRATION INC: $95,544 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetST LANDRY-EVANGELINE SEXUAL ASSAULT: $63,230 over 3y, 13% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Louisiana Coalition A…Louisiana Bar Foundat…United Way of Southea…The Greater New Orlea…Shell USA Company Fou…Amazonsmile Foundation
    Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence IncLA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc · Louisiana Bar Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home