Skip to content
Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc

The Organization is dedicated to bringing about change in institutions, laws, politics, attitudes, and beliefs which will allow individuals to live free of violence.

$9.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$827k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$12MCrime & Legal$2.2MHousing & Shelter$1.6MHealth$684k
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $252k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+14 grants · $8.1M
$99,334
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wellspring$827,424
Faith House Inc$796,826
Project Celebration$787,574
Iris Domestic Violence Center$763,426
Safe Harbor Battered Women's Program$754,842
Metro Center for Community Advocacy$642,142
The Haven$555,449
NEw Orleans Family Justice Center$548,042
Chez Hope Inc$467,658
Family Violence Program of St Bernard$458,734
Family Violence Program of St Bernard$412,637
SAFE$381,146
Iris Domestic Violence Center$377,564
Oasis$339,426
Oasis$148,369
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%Institute for Indian Development: $38k → 16%Communities Against Domestic Abuse: $75k → 19%Wellspring: $827k → 24%Chez Hope Inc: $468k → 25%Project Celebration: $788k → 26%Institute for Indian Development: $13k → 16%Communities Against Domestic Abuse: $19k → 19%Wellspring: $217k → 24%Chez Hope Inc: $121k → 25%Project Celebration: $218k → 26%Communities Against Domestic Abuse: $14k → 19%Wellspring: $107k → 24%Chez Hope Inc: $108k → 25%Project Celebration: $113k → 26%Communities Against Domestic Abuse: $12k → 19%Wellspring: $88k → 24%Chez Hope Inc: $103k → 25%Project Celebration: $55k → 26%Communities Against Domestic Abuse: $9k → 19%Wellspring: $70k → 24%Chez Hope Inc: $75k → 25%Project Celebration: $55k → 26%Wellspring: $51k → 24%Chez Hope Inc: $65k → 25%Project Celebration: $42k → 26%Wellspring: $9k → 24%Chez Hope Inc: $46k → 25%Project Celebration: $17k → 26%Project Celebration: $6k → 26%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$16M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +146% · 33% of their budget
  • FH
    Faith House Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +69%
  • MC
    METRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +101%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

    Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

    —
    2
    Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

    Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

    Human Services
    3
    Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

    Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

    —
    4
    Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

    Rape crisis and abuse shelter

    —
    5
    Community Safety Network

    Victim assistance, advocacy service and safe house; promote public awareness of problems regarding family violence and and sexual abuse; providing counseling and temporary shelter to victims of abuse.

    —
    6
    Northstar Advocacy Center

    This center brings victims of domestic violence and sexual assault together to provide a safe and nurturing place to learn and grow through crisis and case management, court advocacy, support groups and 24 hour crisis hotline.

    Human Services
    7
    Safe Haven a Home Away From Home

    We are a faith based, culturally specific non-profit that provides director community-based services to victims and survivors of domestic violence, homelessness and the child welfare system. we provide case management services, individual…

    Food & Nutrition
    8
    Elijah Haven Crisis Intervention Center Inc

    Provide a safe, healing, nurturing environment for all individuals affected by domestic violence and advocate violence-free living; provide conseling for batterers and victims

    Human Services
    9
    S a F E Shelter

    We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

    —
    10
    Partnership Against Domestic Violence Inc

    The partnership against domestic violence, inc. (padv) works to end the crime of domestic violence and to empower its survivors

    —
    11
    Committee Against Spouse Abuse Inc

    Provide shelter, meals, clothing and counseling for battered women and their children.

    Human Services
    12
    Stopdv

    Special team on the prevention of domestic violence

    Crime & Legal
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metro Centers for Community Advocacy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Institute for Indian Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    6
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    9
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    16/16
    Grantees still filing
    14/16
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    CAPITAL AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $2,072,534 · Human ServicesCAPITAL AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INCFaith House Inc: $1,686,717 · Human ServicesFaith House IncMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC: $1,465,213 · Human ServicesMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INCTHE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC: $1,370,581 · Human ServicesTHE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INCPROJECT CELEBRATION INC: $1,294,647 · Human ServicesPROJECT CELEBRATION INCNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $1,250,073 · Human ServicesNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCESafe Harbor Inc: $1,219,784 · Human ServicesSafe Harbor IncCHEZ HOPE INC: $985,638 · Human ServicesCHEZ HOPE INCOASIS - A SAFE HAVEN FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $663,325 · Human ServicesDART (DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM): $494,358 · Human Services+2 more: $180,103 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM OF ST BERNARD: $1,373,942 · OtherFAMILY VIOL…BEAUREGARD COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC: $188,762 · OtherBEAUREGARD …The Haven Inc: $950,969 · HealthSOUTHEAST SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM: $745,875 · Crime & Legal
    Human Services$12,682,973Other$1,562,704Health$950,969Crime & Legal$745,875

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITAL AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $2,072,534 over 5y, 33% of budgetFaith House Inc: $1,686,717 over 5y, 16% of budgetMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC: $1,465,213 over 5y, 23% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM OF ST BERNARD: $1,373,942 over 5y, 38% of budgetTHE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC: $1,370,581 over 5y, 10% of budgetPROJECT CELEBRATION INC: $1,294,647 over 5y, 37% of budgetNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $1,250,073 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetSafe Harbor Inc: $1,219,784 over 5y, 54% of budgetCHEZ HOPE INC: $985,638 over 5y, 21% of budgetThe Haven Inc: $950,969 over 5y, 24% of budgetSOUTHEAST SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM: $745,875 over 5y, 43% of budgetOASIS - A SAFE HAVEN FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $663,325 over 3y, 42% of budgetDART (DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM): $494,358 over 5y, 14% of budgetBEAUREGARD COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC: $188,762 over 4y, 21% of budgetJEFF DAVIS COMMUNITIES AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $128,602 over 3y, 23% of budgetInstitute for Indian Development Inc: $51,501 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Louisiana Bar Foundat…Louisiana Foundation …Shell USA Company Fou…United Way of Southea…Mary Kay Ash Foundati…The Greater New Orlea…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
    Louisiana Bar FoundationLA34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Louisiana Bar Foundation · Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home