Skip to content

· Public charity

Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centers

Child abuse prevention and advocacy, provide training, technical support and resources to various local CACs in Louisiana

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$272k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$4.9MHealth$558kHuman Services$123kPublic Safety & Disaster$58k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.3M
$212,434
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES$272,429
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY NETWORK$267,015
BATON ROUGE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CET$260,901
CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$256,754
MANNING FAMILY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$254,532
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER HOPE HO$246,768
HEARTS OF HOPE$212,434
GINGERBREAD HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCA$207,168
TERREBONNE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENT$197,710
FAMILY AND YOUTH COUNSELING AGENCY$165,802
JEFFERSON CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTE$119,800
PLAQUEMINES COMMUNITY CARE CENTERS$77,600
PINE HILLS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENT$70,912
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAFOU$54,720
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%Project Celebration: $25k → 26%Project Celebration: $20k → 26%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 15 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$5.3M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

93%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsCrime & LegalHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $632k · revenue +7%
  • GH
    GINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $581k · revenue +118%
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY NETWORK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $558k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $255k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orleans County Child Advocacy Center Inc
Health
2
Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services
3
Delta Childrens Advocacy Center

Delta Childrens Advocacy Centers mission is to respond to child abuse in the Mississippi Delta by serving and nurturing children and non-offending caregivers through a trauma-informed multidisciplinary approach.

Crime & Legal
4
Children's Advocacy Center of Ottawa Countyinc

Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.

Crime & Legal
5
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
6
Louisiana Center for Children's Rights

Using direct representation and advocacy, we fight to keep children out of the justice system so that they can thrive in their homes and communities.

Crime & Legal
7
Child Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District

The Child Advocacy Center serves as a facility where children who are victims of physical abuse and their non-offending members can go for evaluation, intervention, evidence gathering and counseling.

Crime & Legal
8
Casa of West CenLA Inc

Provide children representation before the judicial system

Crime & Legal
9
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
10
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
11
Childrens Advocacy Center for Child Abuse Assessment and Treatment

We provide children affected by violence and their families with services of support, forensic interviews, resources, and hope.

Crime & Legal
12
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocacy Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Celebration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $631,530 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INCSouthern Center for Children & Families Inc: $550,233 · Civil RightsSouthern Center for Children & Families…Childrens Advocacy Center - Hope House: $403,990 · Civil RightsChildrens Advocacy Center - Hope HouseJEFFERSON CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $341,399 · Civil RightsJEFFERSON CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $557,949 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY NETWORK INCHEARTS OF HOPE: $522,886 · Crime & LegalHEARTS OF HOPETERREBONNE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $433,818 · Crime & LegalTERREBONNE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CE…CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAFOURCHE: $105,821 · Crime & LegalCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAF…GINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $580,942 · HealthGINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSI…Family and Youth Counseling Agency Inc: $303,552 · HealthFamily and Youth Counse…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $254,532 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INCBATON ROUGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $550,835 · Youth DevelopmentBATON ROUGE…Plaquemines Community CARE Centers Foundation Inc: $135,112 · Public Safety & DisasterPINE HILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $106,383 · Arts & CultureNew Orleans Children's Advocacy Center: $71,557 · OtherPROJECT CELEBRATION INC: $45,086 · Human Services
Civil Rights$1,927,152Crime & Legal$1,620,474Health$1,139,026Youth Development$550,835Public Safety & Disaster$135,112Arts & Culture$106,383Other$71,557Human Services$45,086

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $631,530 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetGINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $580,942 over 5y, 14% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $557,949 over 5y, 10% of budgetBATON ROUGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $550,835 over 5y, 19% of budgetSouthern Center for Children & Families Inc: $550,233 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetHEARTS OF HOPE: $522,886 over 5y, 16% of budgetTERREBONNE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $433,818 over 5y, 36% of budgetChildrens Advocacy Center - Hope House: $403,990 over 5y, 15% of budgetJEFFERSON CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $341,399 over 4y, 70% of budgetFamily and Youth Counseling Agency Inc: $303,552 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $254,532 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlaquemines Community CARE Centers Foundation Inc: $135,112 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetPINE HILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $106,383 over 3y, 27% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAFOURCHE: $105,821 over 3y, 66% of budgetPROJECT CELEBRATION INC: $45,086 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louisiana Bar FoundationLA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louisiana Bar Foundation · Brooke It Forward Foundation · National Children's Alliance Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centers?

    Find your warmest path to Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph