Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis W Baehr and Dolpha Baehr Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$326kHuman Services$309kEducation$250kYouth Development$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$67kScience & Tech$59kPublic Benefit$57kEnvironment$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF OSAWATOMIE$56,000
MY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$54,945
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSN$40,000
Individual grant recipient$38,495
USD # 416 LOUISBURG PUBLIC SCHOOL$10,200
PAOLA ASSOCIATION FOR CHURCH ACTION$10,000
FRIENDS OF LIBRARY DISTRICT #2 OF LINN COUNTY- LACYGNE$10,000
MIAMI COUNTY CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
USD #367 OSAWATOMIE PUBLIC SCHOOL$8,600
ALWAYS & FUREVER MIDWEST ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC$8,000
PRAIRIE VIEW EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$7,500
USD # 368$5,462
Individual grant recipient$5,070
SPRING HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
ALL FOR MOMS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $448k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAFEHOME INC: $5k → 5%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $3k → 10%LAKEMARY CENTER INC: $79k → 7%MY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $78k → 7%MY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $55k → 7%MY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $55k → 7%MY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $55k → 7%LAKEMARY CENTER INC: $50k → 7%LAKEMARY CENTER INC: $36k → 7%MY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $27k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 25 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+2%

Still filing today

40%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAKEMARY CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $165k · revenue +25%
  • MC
    MIAMI COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $100k · revenue +5%
  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Association
    5× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION POST 250 JOHN F HAND CHAPTER
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • CO
    CITY OF PAOLA FIRE DEPARMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • U3
    USD # 368 YELLOW RIBBON PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Kansas Humane Society of Wichita Kansas

The kansas humane society is a community resource for pets and people, dedicated to enhancing the welfare of all companion animals.

Animals
3
Cares Ks Foundation
Animals
4
Kansas Insurance & Financial Services Education Foundation
Education
5
Kansas City Hospice Inc

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Human Services
6
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
7
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
8
Shepherds Center of Kansas Cty Ctl

To honor our elders by celebrating, empowering and serving older adults.

—
9
Girl Scouts of Kansas Heartland Inc

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
10
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
11
Kansas Affordable Housing Corporation

Provide support for mennonite housing rehabilitation services, inc., which provides low-income housing for the elderly and disabled through hud housing programs that provide low-income families with ownership opportunities and the…

Housing & Shelter
12
Kansas Senior Living Inc

The organization owns and operates a nursing facility for the elderly and disabled.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spring Hill Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $83,555 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF OSAWATOMIE: $56,000 · OtherCITY OF OSAWATOMIEUSD # 368: $50,217 · OtherUSD # 368FRIENDS OF LIBRARY DISTRICT NO 2 OF LINN COUNTY - LA CYGNE: $47,122 · OtherFRIENDS OF LIBRARY DISTRICT NO 2 OF LINN COU…Individual grant recipient: $45,171 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRAIRIE VIEW EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $31,183 · OtherPRAIRIE VIEW EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONAMERICAN LEGION POST 250 JOHN F HAND CHAPTER: $23,439 · OtherCITY OF PAOLA FIRE DEPT: $19,603 · OtherPAOLA YOUTH BASEBALL INC: $17,800 · Other+24 more: $151,243 · Other+24 moreMY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $270,024 · Human ServicesMY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICE INCLAKEMARY CENTER INC: $164,750 · Human ServicesLAKEMARY CENTER INC+2 more: $13,140 · Human ServicesMIAMI COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthMIAMI COUNTY …MIAMI COUNTY CANCER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthMIAMI COUNTY …+1 more: $5,000 · HealthThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $65,000 · EducationSPRING HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16,000 · EducationMIAMI COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $62,901 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentWildwood Outdoor Education Center: $35,000 · EnvironmentAlways & Furever Midwest Animal Sanctuary: $13,000 · Animals
Other$525,333Human Services$447,914Health$155,000Education$81,000Youth Development$70,901Environment$35,000Animals$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $270,024 over 5y, 18% of budgetLAKEMARY CENTER INC: $164,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMIAMI COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI COUNTY CANCER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetWildwood Outdoor Education Center: $35,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSPRING HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetAlways & Furever Midwest Animal Sanctuary: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $8,140 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAll for Moms Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MY FATHERS HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEMARY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTY CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wildwood Outdoor Education Center ↗
  • Who funds SPRING HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Always & Furever Midwest Animal Sanctuary ↗
  • Who funds KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
  • Who funds All for Moms Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Greater Horizons · Dean E & Cleta J Smith Charitable Fund First Option Bank Trustee · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Ash Grove Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis W Baehr and Dolpha Baehr Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis W Baehr and Dolpha Baehr Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis W Baehr and Dolpha Baehr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph