How much did LOUIS S AND BARBARA L KAHN grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 93% of LOUIS S AND BARBARA L KAHN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

eaglevalleyyouthveteransblindchildrenisrael

2019

youtheagleveteransactionhighland parkchildrenisrael

2020

braillechabadchildrenresearchhighland park

2021

childrenresearchisraelstates

2022

coast guard

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

NORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL$3,250
ACPMP FOUNDATION$500
VASCULITUS FOUNDATION$500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (JNF)$500
MAOT CHITIM$480
CANCER WELLNESS$250
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$200
CHICAGO HUMANITIES$125
CENTER FOR SMALL TOWN JEWISH LIFE$100
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$100
EPHRAIM FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION$50

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$47k · 66 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +65% for the ones you funded once.

66 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$47k

$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%

+65%

Still filing today

23%

17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $725 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthInternationalAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YC
YOUTH CELEBRATE DIVERSITY
3× · 2017–2019 · $750 · revenue +79%
NJ
NECHAMA JEWISH RESPONSE TO DISASTER
5× · 2017–2022 · $704 · revenue +13%
US
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM
7× · 2017–2023 · $590 · revenue +16%

Funded once

CS
CASMI SCHOLARSHIP FUND
one grant, 2021 · $2k
CA
CHICAGO ASSOCIATION OF SPRING MANUFACTURERSgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +805%
W
WINGS
one grant, 2019 · $650

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Network of Jewish Human Service

Advances efforts in best practices, innovation, research and partnerships to strengthen non-profit jewish human service agencies so they can better serve their communities.

Human Services

United Israel Appeal Inc

Uia is responsible for the allocation and oversight of funds raised by the united states jewish federation campaigns expended in israel by the jewish agency for israel.

International

Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Promote a culture of philanthropy, leverage resources to meet local and global jewish needs and facilitate community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

American Jewish World Service Inc

We work to realize human rights and end poverty in africa, asia, latin america and the caribbean.

International

National Council of Jewish Women

Inspired by jewish values, the national council of jewish women is a grassroots organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children, and families, and by safeguarding…

Community Improvement

Jewish Family and Children's Service

To support people of all backgrounds to reach their full potential.

Human Services

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.

Health

Foundation for Jewish

The organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks, accepts,…

Philanthropy

Jewish Family and Children's Service

Provide behavioral health and social services to children, families and adults of all ages.

Human Services

Federation of State Medical Boards of

Leader in medical regulation, serving as an innovative catalyst for effective policy & standards.

Health

Hand in Hand American Friends of the

Afhih supports & promotes hand in hand in its work creating partnership & shared society between jewish & arab citizens of israel. its impact expands to over 10,000 children, teens & adults across israel where its model of integrated…

International

American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u. s. - israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/28

the rest of the field

11%

7,683/72,331

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

18/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$51,436Youth Development$750Public Safety & Disaster$704Arts & Culture$690International$639Animals$291Education$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LOUIS S AND BARBARA L KAHN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHICAGO ASSOCIATION OF SPRING MANUFACTURERS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~18 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 9.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 363480100 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CHICAGO ASSOCIATION OF SPRING MANUFACTURERS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Louis S and Barbara L Kahn?

Find your warmest path to Louis S and Barbara L Kahn through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LOUIS S AND BARBARA L KAHN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louis S and Barbara L Kahn?

More from the funding graph

LOUIS S AND BARBARA L KAHN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louis S and Barbara L Kahn?

More from the funding graph