How much did Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust grant in FY2019?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

childrensgreaterartsfrostmia

2019

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2019 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

Under $10k11 grants · $22k
$10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$50k–250k1 grant · $170k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

LEIBOWITZ & GREENWAY FAMILY CHARITABLE$170,086
U OF M MANCINI FELLOWS SCHLRSHP FND$10,000
BROWARD PERFORMING ART CENTER$10,000
CHOPIN FDN OF THE US$10,000
NEW WORLD SYMPHONY$8,000
CAMILLUS HOUSE$2,000
MIAMI CITY BALLET$2,000
VESTIBULAR DISORDER ASSOCIATION$2,000
MIAMI MUSIC FESTIVAL$2,000
FAN$1,000
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$1,000
WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK$1,000
NAACP$1,000
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$1,000
SACRED CIR ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOLS$602

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 13%. 67% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$216k · 41 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2019, 31 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$216k

$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%

+39%

Still filing today

37%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

I
ILLUMINARTS
2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +88%
CH
CAMILLUS HOUSE
3× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +142%
MS
MIAMI SALON GROUP
2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +24%

Funded once

FG
FLORIDA GRAND OPERA
one grant, 2017 · $83k · revenue -92%
A
AMERICARES
one grant, 2017 · $11k
GM
GROWING MINDS
one grant, 2018 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Miami International Festival Inc

—

University of Miami

—

Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education

Greater Miami Opera Inc

To enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera. greater miami opera aims to be a driving force of cultural growth in south florida through the presentation of the most comprehensive art form in the world -…

Arts & Culture

South Florida Symphony Orchestra

Remaining true to its mission to delight, inspire and educate the community, south florida symphony orchestra (sfso) performed more than 50 in person concerts and events for patrons throughout the south florida region, including monroe,…

Arts & Culture

Opera Guild Inc of Fort Lauderdale

To enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera in broward county.

Arts & Culture

Miami Youth Orchestra Inc

Youth orchestra (music class & events)

Education

Dance Now Ensemble Inc

The mission of dance now miami is to promote the artistic vision of co- founders hannah baumgarten and diego salterini. the company creates, promotes and produces contemporary dance of the highest caliber and through performance, arts…

Arts & Culture

Miami Symphony Orchestra Inc

Renowned for its artistic excellence, innovative programming and commitment to community engagement, the miami symphony orchestra, celebrating its 35th season, stands as miami cultural cornestone and a premier orchestral institution in…

—

Miami Chamber Music Society

Present classical music concerts and educational and community outreach activities.

Arts & Culture

Alhambra Music Inc

Community orchestra

Arts & Culture

Miami New Drama

Theatre production including an eclectic mix of original plays, musicals, classics and world premiers featuring specially commissioned work.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Music Festival Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leibowitz and Greenway Family Charitable. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/37

the rest of the field

14%

9,304/67,443

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

33/33

Grantees still filing

24/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$256,302Philanthropy$171,086Arts & Culture$117,000Education$13,000Health$5,000Environment$5,000Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL25.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Fifty Over Fifty Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Olga and David Melin Foundation Inc · Dennis Edwards & Mark Steinberg · The Clinton Family Fund · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

11get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LEIBOWITZ & GREENWAY FAMILY CHARITABLE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 656358233 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LEIBOWITZ & GREENWAY FAMILY CHARITABLE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louis Leibowitz Memorial Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph