Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis Kesten & Esther Kesten Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$290k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$136k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$951kReligion$821kPhilanthropy$200kArts & Culture$121kPublic Benefit$99kEducation$80kFood & Nutrition$20kSocial Science$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $210k
$2,905
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST$135,961
OPERATION BENJAMIN$73,816
SEFORIM BLOG INC$24,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC$19,000
YISMACH MOSHE INSTITUTE$16,000
CONGREGATION AGUDATH ISRAEL$10,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF CENTURY CITY$2,905
SHARSHERET$1,800
RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA$1,800
BNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
VALLEY TORAH HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLOBAL KINDNESS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
NJ
RI
CA
MD
DE
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 24 repeat orgs$809k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
26

Total granted

$1.4M
$673k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+14%

Still filing today

46%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationReligionPhilanthropyPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CHANA UK INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue ×22
  • OB
    OPERATION BENJAMIN INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $89k · revenue +405%
  • TG
    THE GESHER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • GM
    Gindi Maimonides Academy
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • AY
    AM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +176%
  • TD
    THE DESTINY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +1% · 27% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
The Bnai Jacob Foundation
—
5
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
8
Yakar Foundation Inc
—
9
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
11
Jewish Life Foundation
—
12
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Israel Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT: $310,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMATAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN: $200,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILANAVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $135,961 · OtherAVAILABLE UPON REQUESTNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $106,365 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAELTSHECHENOV INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL: $100,000 · OtherTSHECHENOV INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAELYESHIVA OF LOS ANGELES GIRLS SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL CHESED FUND: $40,000 · Other+23 more: $194,554 · Other+23 moreFRIENDS OF CHANA UK INC: $200,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF CHANA UK …AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUC…THE GESHER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · InternationalTHE GESHER FOUNDATIO…Central Fund of Israel: $31,800 · InternationalCentral Fund of Isra…+2 more: $16,550 · InternationalGindi Maimonides Academy: $250,000 · ReligionGindi Maimoni…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT OROT INC: $20,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIE…BNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES: $13,600 · ReligionOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,800 · ReligionAM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationAM YISRAEL …THE DESTINY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationTHE DESTINY…THE TIKVAH FUND: $25,000 · EducationTHE TIKVAH …YULA HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $3,600 · EducationPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $198,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN F…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyOPERATION BENJAMIN INC: $89,216 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public BenefitSharsheret Inc: $3,600 · Health
Other$1,146,880International$448,350Religion$295,400Education$238,600Philanthropy$219,000Public Benefit$99,216Health$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $198,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DESTINY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetOPERATION BENJAMIN INC: $89,216 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE GESHER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $31,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT OROT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES: $13,600 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $11,550 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBeis Midrash of Queens: $10,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYULA HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGLOBAL KINDNESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Gindi Maimonides Academy ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHANA UK INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DESTINY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BENJAMIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GESHER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds THE TIKVAH FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT OROT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds BNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC ↗
  • Who funds Beis Midrash of Queens ↗
  • Who funds YULA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY33.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jay Morris Foundation Inc · Fjc · Davmarn Foundation · Jack and Gitta Nagel Foundation · Ryzman Foundation Inc · The Elishis Family Foundation · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis Kesten & Esther Kesten Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis Kesten & Esther Kesten Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Rabbinical College of America: 5% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Louis Kesten & Esther Kesten Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Louis Kesten & Esther Kesten Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Louis Kesten & Esther Kesten’s filings →

More from the funding graph