Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lostn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$176kInternational$123kFood & Nutrition$114kHealth$41kEducation$30kEnvironment$25kPhilanthropy$20kHousing & Shelter$2k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE PARK$15,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$10,000
SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$10,000
ROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN$5,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$3,000
MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW ISRAEL FUND: $10k → 17%FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS AND SCULPTURE PARK: $23k → 11%NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%OX-BOW FARM & CONSERVATION CENTER: $100k → 14%NEW ISREAL FUND: $4k → 17%FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS AND SCULPTURE PARK: $20k → 11%NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS AND SCULPTURE PARK: $20k → 11%NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE PARK: $15k → 11%NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE PARK: $10k → 11%NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SCHOOL OF THE ART INST OF CHICAGO: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES: $3k → 17%FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS AND SCULPTURE PARK: $10k → 11%NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE PARK: $10k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WEST & NORTHERN MI: $3k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WEST & NORTHERN MI: $3k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WEST & NORTHERN MI: $3k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER: $10k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER: $10k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER: $10k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONT ART CENTER: $8k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONT ART CENTER: $7k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONT ART CENTER: $6k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONT ART CENTER: $5k → 14%ROOTS & CULTURE CONT ART CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OR
PA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$373k · 12 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$373k
$100k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +98%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    4× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +45%
  • WM
    WEST MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY INC DBA FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • OF
    OX-BOW FARM & CONSERVATION CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
5
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
8
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
11
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
12
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Michigan; the most unlike its peers is Roots & Culture Contemporary Artcenter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OX-BOW FARM & CONSERVATION CENTER: $100,000 · OtherOX-BOW FARM & CONSERVATION CENTERFREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS AND SCULPTURE PARK: $82,500 · OtherFREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS AND SCULPTURE PARKGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYNEW ISREAL FUND: $15,600 · OtherNEW ISREAL FUNDPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WEST & NORTHERN MI: $12,000 · Other+1 more: $2,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES U…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $27,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERV…NEW ISRAEL FUND: $26,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ARTCENTER: $61,100 · Arts & CultureROOTS & CULTU…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $32,000 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthWEST MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY INC DBA FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS: $25,000 · EnvironmentMEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $13,500 · Food & NutritionGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Philanthropy
Other$242,100International$123,000Arts & Culture$61,100Education$32,000Health$29,000Environment$25,000Food & Nutrition$13,500Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ARTCENTER: $61,100 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY INC DBA FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $13,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ARTCENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds WEST MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY INC DBA FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lostn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lostn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lostn Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lostn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lostn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph