Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lorna a Welch Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$458kHealth$94k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$19,500
UNIVERSITY OF OLIVET$13,000
KETTERING UNIVERSITY$13,000
SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$13,000
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$13,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$13,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$6,500
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY$6,500
NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY$6,500
LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RACHEL WOLCOTT: $5k → 5%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $7k → 8%NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY: $7k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF OLIVET: $13k → 9%CALVIN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $5k → 12%SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY: $6k → 13%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 13%SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $26k → 16%JOHN STOCKTON: $6k → 16%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $7k → 21%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 8%OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $7k → 8%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $13k → 12%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%REBEKAH KRIESCH: $6k → 16%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $7k → 21%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%LANDEN MOORE: $6k → 16%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%LULA KARAKITSOS: $6k → 16%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%LAYNE BRAMAN: $6k → 16%NOAH FERGUSON: $6k → 16%PAIGE BAXTER: $6k → 16%SAGA KINNING: $5k → 16%CASEY KRAMER: $5k → 16%MCCAYLA WALLACE: $5k → 16%COLE DUNSTAN: $6k → 16%KETTERING UNIVERSITY: $13k → 16%KETTERING UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%KETTERING UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $26k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $20k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $13k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$334k · 9 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
36

Total granted

$334k
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+1%

Still filing today

33%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    5× · 2021–2025 · $94k · revenue +96%
  • KU
    Kettering University
    4× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +19%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • OU
    OAKLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • CU
    CALVIN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
3
Alfred University

Alfred University's mission is helping students realize their purpose. People living a life of purpose enjoy longer and happier lives. Alfred University promotes its mission through three core strengths - Intersections, Mentorship, and…

Education
4
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
5
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
6
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
7
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
8
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
9
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
10
Allen University

Allen University is an academic community which provides students an opportunity to obtain baccalaureate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs in traditional and distance education formats. The University has a…

Education
11
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
12
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Calvin University; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $93,500 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $87,973 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $45,605 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $24,500 · OtherWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $19,500 · Other+35 more: $207,000 · Other+35 moreKettering University: $26,715 · EducationKettering Unive…UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $13,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF D…CALVIN UNIVERSITY: $6,500 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSI…LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $6,500 · EducationLAWRENCE TECHNO…Northwood University: $6,500 · EducationNorthwood Unive…Spring Arbor University: $5,715 · EducationSpring Arbor Un…KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO COLLE…Cornerstone University: $3,096 · Education+1 more: $715 · Education
Other$478,078Education$73,741

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $93,500 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetKettering University: $26,715 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwood University: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $5,715 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone University: $3,096 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $715 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Kettering University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Northwood University ↗
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable TrMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable Tr · The Gerber Foundation · Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lorna a Welch Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lorna a Welch Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lorna a Welch Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph