Loading…
· Private foundation
LORENE COOPER HASBROUCK CHARITABLE TRUST
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$149k
Granted FY2025
12
Grants
1
Communities
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 97% of LORENE COOPER HASBROUCK CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
2025
tulsa
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $131k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
- 1ST STEP MALE DIVERSION$30,000
- BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$25,000
- PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA$25,000
- IRON GATE$11,000
- 12&12 INC$10,000
- TULSA DAY CENTER$10,000
- GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$10,000
- SALVATION ARMY$10,000
- TULSA BOYS HOME$5,000
- HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
- PENCIL BOX$5,000
- HOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY$2,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
5
Total granted
$1.1M
$51k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-11%
+46%
Still filing today
40%
20%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Food & NutritionReligionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 1I12&12 INC7× · 2018–2025 · $530k · revenue +82%
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA8× · 2018–2025 · $260k · revenue -11%
- PCPARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA3× · 2023–2025 · $150k
Funded once
- GMGILCREASE MUSEUMone grant, 2022 · $30k
- GMGRAND MENTAL HEALTHone grant, 2024 · $10k
MEALS ON WHEELSgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
—
2
Oklahoma Halfway House Inc
Assist individuals experiencing homelessness with urgent critical needs, like housing.
Health
3
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma
Empowering families on their journey to independence.
Housing & Shelter
4
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
Employment
5
Tulsa Spca
Animals
6
Tulsa Bike Share Inc
Transforming our Tulsa community by providing a high quality, convenient, and affordable bicycle transit system that connects people to places where they live, work, and play.
Environment
7
Indian Health Care Resource Center Inc
Provide quality, comprehensive health care to tulsa area indian people in a culturally sensitive manner that promotes good health, well being and harmony.
Health
8
One Hope Tulsa Inc
One Hope cultivates safe spaces and relationships for neighborhood flourishing.
Community Improvement
9
Tulsa Casa Inc
Tulsa casa, as authorized by oklahoma law, is organized to speak for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe,…
Civil Rights
10
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services.
—
11
Tulsa Area United Way
The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.
—
12
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc
Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Boys' Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Pencil Box Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,177,527Religion$11,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Human Services$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Education$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Ralph and Frances McGill FoundationOK20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation · Tulsa Economic Development Corporation · Stuart Family Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LORENE COOPER HASBROUCK CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~9 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 730579230 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Lorene Cooper Hasbrouck Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Lorene Cooper Hasbrouck Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines