How much did LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW grant in FY2024?

LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW reported 3 grants totaling $12,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW based?

LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW is based in MO.

LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW

This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.

$12k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$5k

Largest

01What you fund

0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$56kHealth$12kCrime & Legal$10kFood & Nutrition$10kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$20k

02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000

Median grant

States reached

$348k

Total assets

Largest grants

METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD$5,000
SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO$4,000
GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 7%. 32% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$41k · 3 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$41k

$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

+67%

Still filing today

100%

80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TW
TWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION
5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +50%
SC
SUPPORT CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCATES
2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue -9%
BA
BARN AT SPRING BROOK FARM INC
2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +41%

Funded once

AA
ARC ALLIANCE GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES
one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -6%
SF
SHARE FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +361%
RS
ROYER-GREAVES SCHOOL FOR THE
one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Pennsylvania Statewide Independent

To use our legal mandate to expand civil rights for individuals with disabilities.

Human Services

Humane Pennsylvania

Provides adoption centers, non-profit vet hospitals and clinics, & animal welfare mgmt services

Animals

Keystone Care

Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.

Health

Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion

Center for Independent Living of Central

The mission of the center for independent living of central pennsylvania is to eliminate and prevent barriers that people with disabilities experience.

—

Whole Life Services Inc

Whole life services, inc.'s mission is to provide quality, individualized supports and services to people with disabilities and their families.

Human Services

United Cerebral Palsy of

Ucp of central pennsylvania empowers people of diverse abilities to live a meaningful life through innovative support and services.

—

The Arc of Centre County Pa Inc

Service provider dedicated to improving the lives of persons with developmental disabilities.

—

Montco Anti-Hunger Network

Montco anti-hunger network works to end hunger, through innovation, emergency food provider support, best practices, policy advocacy and providing food resources.

Food & Nutrition

Human Services Inc

Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.

Human Services

Meals On Wheels of Chester County

To provide nutritious meals and personal interaction to homebound adults living in chester county to help them live independently in their own homes.

Human Services

Skills of Central Pennsylvania Inc

Skills' administers a broad range of human service programs which provide mental health and intellectual disabilities programs to clients within various counties of the commonwealth of pa

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Barn At Spring Brook Farm Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humangood Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

14/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$55,600Other$20,000Health$11,500Crime & Legal$10,000Food & Nutrition$9,500Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Caroline J S Sanders TdMO16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Caroline J S Sanders Td · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · The Wawa Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LAUGHING AT MY NIGHTMARE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~20 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +67% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 454553464 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LAUGHING AT MY NIGHTMARE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 20 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Long Sara Dedc Char Fd Tw?

Find your warmest path to Long Sara Dedc Char Fd Tw through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Long Sara Dedc Char Fd Tw?

More from the funding graph

LONG SARA DEDC CHAR FD TW

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Long Sara Dedc Char Fd Tw?

More from the funding graph