· Private foundation
Long Sara Dedc Char Fd Tw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUPPORT CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCATES | $5,000 |
| METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD | $5,000 |
| LIFEPATH FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +71%
- SCSupport Center for Child Advocates3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue -8%
- MAMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue -26%
Funded once
- TATHE ARC ALLIANCE GUARDIANSHIP SERVICESone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -44%
- SFSHARE FOOD PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -29%
- RSROYER-GREAVES SCHOOL FOR THEone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…
To provide nutritious meals and personal interaction to homebound adults living in chester county to help them live independently in their own homes.
Serving seniors, inc. enhances and preserves the quality of life for a growing population of older adults in northeastern pennsylvania. serving seniors, inc. advocates for and gives voice to those unable to live at home, those residing in…
Provide services to meet the needs of senior citizens of Jefferson County, Pennsylvania
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
The mission of the lancaster county council on aging is to provide a system of coordinated and comprehensive services to enable older persons of lancaster county to continue to maintain their independence.
Our mission is to ensure that Chicago seniors and people with disabilities benefit from nutritious meal programs that improve their quality of life and maximize independence.
To nourish and enrich the lives of the homebound and other people in need through programs that promote dignity and independent living.
Meals on wheels of central maryland's charitable mission, to keep homebound people living safely and independently at home through the provision of nutritious meals, personal contact and support services, reduces hospitalization, and…
Seniorsplus' mission is to enrich the lives of older adults, adults with disabilities, caregivers and family members by supporting their independence, dignity and quality of life. as both the agency on aging for androscoggin, franklin and…
Our mission is to enhance the quality of life for all older citizens
Westmass eldercare, inc. is an aging services access point and designated area agency on aging that provides services which include in-home support, informational services, nursing home advocacy, legal assistance, meal site transportation…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Area Neighborhood Nutrition Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Twilight Wish Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TWILIGHT WISH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Support Center for Child Advocates ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE BARN AT SPRING BROOK FARM INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC ALLIANCE GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SHARE FOOD PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds LAUGHING AT MY NIGHTMARE INC ↗
- Who funds PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHESTNUT HILL MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO ↗
- Who funds SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE POCONOS INC ↗
- Who funds SIGHTS FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds LIFEPATH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BERKS ENCORE INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR EASTON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Caroline J S Sanders Td · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Bartlett Fdn · W W Smith Charitable Trust · The Wawa Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Long Sara Dedc Char Fd Tw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.