How much did BARTLETT FDN grant in FY2024?

BARTLETT FDN reported 23 grants totaling $105,150 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

BARTLETT FDN

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

BARTLETT FDN

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$105k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

0162% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$119kHealth$112kAnimals$69kArts & Culture$56kYouth Development$14kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$5kEmployment$5kPhilanthropy$5kOther$246k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

reading

2020

foodchristiangreater

2021

momsreading

2022

momsreading

2023

moms

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k22 grants · $95k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK$10,000
HUMANE PENNSYLVANIA$6,500
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BERKS COUNTY INC$6,500
READING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN$6,000
GOGGLEWORKS$6,000
PHOEBE BERKS HEALTH CARE CENTER INC$5,150
RED CORNER BENEFIT INC$5,000
LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC$5,000
NEPA INCLUSIVE$5,000
NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC$5,000
REIKICATS HAVEN$5,000
BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE$5,000
THE CAMEL PROJECT$5,000
BOOTS TO HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$5,000
CASA OF BERKS COUNTY$4,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$499k · 29 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$499k

$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%

+33%

Still filing today

69%

48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GS
GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK
7× · 2018–2024 · $55k · revenue +20%
RS
READING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN
6× · 2018–2024 · $37k · revenue +66%
AR
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BERKS COUNTY INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +156%

Funded once

WW
WILDFIRE WARRIORS USA INC
one grant, 2020 · $10k
WE
WIN EARLY LITERACY INC
one grant, 2022 · $6k
MO
METROS OF TOMORROW YOUTH BARBER ACADEMY
one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Humangood Pennsylvania

To help older adults live their best lives possible, however they define it.

Human Services

Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care

Education

Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Penn highlands healthcare is a community-based and controlled health care system that exists to improve regional access to quality healthcare.

Health

Pennsylvania College of Health Sciences

The college's mission is to educate for excellence in healthcare practice, leadership, and the continuous acquisition of knowledge.

—

Pennsylvania Interscholastic

The charitable purposes of piaa are set forth in its constitution which indicate piaa promotes and supports the educational values of interscholastic athletics and the high ideals of good sportsmanship. further, it promotes, establishes…

—

Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The provision of education, research, and charitable patient care services.

Education

Highmark Health

Highmark Health's mission is to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by making healthcare more easily accessible, understandable and affordable.

Health

Philadelphia Chamber Music Society

To engage our community in a life more beautiful through the shared experience and transformative impact of chamber music.

Arts & Culture

Philadelphia University

To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.

Education

Pennsylvania Association for

Cultivating environmentally sound, economically viable, community-focused farms and food systems.

Food & Nutrition

Susquehanna Physician Services

Susquehanna physician services is a subsidiary of the exempt entity upmc suquehanna. our vision is to create an integrated community health system that delivers world class care. our values are to carefully place our patients and their…

Health

Main Line Hospitals Inc

Provide a comprehensive range of health services, complemented by educational & research activities that meet the needs and improve the quality of life in the communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diakon Child Family & Community and the most unlike its peers is United Disabilities Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/40

the rest of the field

1,895/21,477

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

36/37

Grantees still filing

30/37

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$261,191Human Services$118,724Health$112,030Animals$69,023Arts & Culture$55,500Youth Development$14,000Education$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berks County Community Foundation IncPA28.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berks County Community Foundation Inc · Helping Harvest Fresh Food Bank · Lancaster County Community Foundation · United Way of Berks County Inc · The Breidegam Family Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Blue Mountain Foundation · Ethel S C Smith No 5 Charitable Tw · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Pennsylvania Automotive Association · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BARTLETT FDN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RED CORNER BENEFIT INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 473223525 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on RED CORNER BENEFIT INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Bartlett Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Bartlett Fdn through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BARTLETT FDN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bartlett Fdn?

More from the funding graph

BARTLETT FDN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bartlett Fdn?

More from the funding graph