· Private foundation
Bartlett Fdn
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK | $10,000 |
| HUMANE PENNSYLVANIA | $6,500 |
| ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BERKS COUNTY INC | $6,500 |
| GOGGLEWORKS | $6,000 |
| READING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSN | $6,000 |
| PHOEBE BERKS HEALTH CARE CENTER INC | $5,150 |
| LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC | $5,000 |
| RED CORNER BENEFIT INC | $5,000 |
| BOOTS TO HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| NEPA INCLUSIVE | $5,000 |
| THE CAMEL PROJECT | $5,000 |
| REIKICATS HAVEN | $5,000 |
| BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC | $5,000 |
| CASA OF BERKS COUNTY | $4,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK7× · 2018–2024 · $55k · revenue +23%
- RSREADING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION6× · 2018–2024 · $37k · revenue +66%
- ARANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BERKS COUNTY INC7× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- WWWILDLIFE WARRIORS USA INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -96%
- WEWIN EARLY LITERACY INCone grant, 2022 · $6k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARTIES OF NORTHEASTERN PENSYLVANIA INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…
Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.
Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.
Easter seals eastern pa creates life-changing solutions for individuals with disablities and their families in their community by increasing independence, maximizing opportunities, minimizing barriers and enhancing quality of life.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.
Geisinger health plan strives to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health care to the community through equitable, innovative,and inclusive care and coverage models.
We "make dreams come true." we provide children and adults with autism, intellectual/developmental disabilities and behavioral health challenges and their families the education, services and resources needed to be self-reliant,…
Ppi is operated solely by penn state health and is dedicated to providing exceptional clinical care, advancing diverse educational opportunities for the next generation of behavioral health specialists, fostering impactful research, and…
Continuing care retirement community providing a full range of quality amenities & support including an accredited LifeCare model that provides priority access to future healthcare services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Pennsylvania Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boots to Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds READING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BERKS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
- Who funds AARON'S ACRES ↗
- Who funds RED CREEK WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BERKS ENCORE INC ↗
- Who funds PHOEBE-DEVITT HOMES ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds POTTSTOWN AREA SENIORS' CENTER ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE WARRIORS USA INC ↗
- Who funds ASCEND CLINICAL SERVICES DBA NAAMAN CLINICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Red Corner Benefit Inc ↗
- Who funds THE YOCUM INSTITUTE FOR ARTS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GOGGLE WORKS ↗
- Who funds SIGHTS FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Southeastern Pennsylvania ↗
- Who funds The Children's Home of Reading ↗
- Who funds WIN EARLY LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds PHOEBE BERKS HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARTIES OF NORTHEASTERN PENSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
- Who funds Unite for HER ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD TRUST ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA PHILHARMONIC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN RECOVERY AFTERCARE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berks County Community Foundation Inc · The Breidegam Family Foundation · Blue Mountain Foundation · The Wyomissing Foundation Inc · United Way of Berks County Inc · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · Marlin Miller Jr Family Foundation · Lancaster County Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bartlett Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.