Skip to content
Long Realty Cares Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Long Realty Cares Foundation

Long Realty Cares Foundation offers the promise of hope to those who need shelter, sustenance, and comfort, and commitment to serve the needs of the communities in which we work and live.

$257k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Housing & Shelter$107kHealth$79kFood & Nutrition$46kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $106,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $256,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $150,900 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESPERANZA EN ESCALANTE INC$40,000
BEN'S BELLS INC$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SIERRA VISTA INC$15,000
GREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES$10,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SO AZ$10,000
SOL FOOD INTIATIVES INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SO AZ: $10k → 15%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SIERRA VISTA INC: $15k → 18%PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION: $7k → 18%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SO AZ: $10k → 15%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SO AZ: $10k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUCSON: $20k → 15%SOUTHERN ARIZONA AIDS FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%SOL FOOD INTIATIVES INC: $6k → 15%BEN'S BELLS INC: $25k → 15%TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART & HISTORIC BLOCK: $6k → 15%GREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $10k → 15%ESPERANZA EN ESCALANTE: $40k → 15%TMC FOUNDATION: $40k → 15%ESPERANZA EN ESCALANTE INC: $40k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
4
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
5
Sahuarita Food Bank

The organization's mission is to feed the hungry in the community through education, advocacy and the acquisition, storage and distribution of food.

Food & Nutrition
6
Tmm Family Services Inc

TMM's mission is to provide quality affordale housing, essential education, and stabiliity for qualifying low-income seniors, single parents, and veterans within the Greater Tucson area.

—
7
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
8
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services
9
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
10
Social Venture Partners Tucson

Svp tucson is an ever expanding community of engaged philanthropists dedicated to building the capacity, strength and impact of nonprofits in addressing social problems. we accomplish this through: thoughtful and strategic investments and…

Philanthropy
11
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
12
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sol Food Intiatives Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Esperanza En Escalante Inc: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterEsperanza En Escalante IncHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity Tucson IncThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Primavera Foundation IncTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthTMC HEALTH FOUNDATIONBEN'S BELLS INC: $25,000 · HealthBEN'S BELLS INCSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $8,000 · HealthSouthern Arizona AIDS FoundationNOURISH: $6,000 · HealthNOURISHCommunity Food Bank Inc: $30,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank …GREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER VAIL COMMUNI…SOL FOOD INTIATIVES INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionSOL FOOD INTIATIVES …Boys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC: $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Housing & Shelter$107,000Health$79,000Food & Nutrition$46,000Youth Development$15,000Arts & Culture$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEsperanza En Escalante Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEN'S BELLS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGREATER VAIL COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISH: $6,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Arizona Community Fou…The Intuit FoundationThe Hs Lopez Family F…United Way of Tucson …Texas Instruments Fou…The Stonewall Foundat…Connie Hillman Family…Community Food Bank I…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Stonewall Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Community Food Bank Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Long Realty Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Long Realty Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Long Realty Cares Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Long Realty Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $127k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Long Realty Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home