Loading…
· Public charity
LONG CENTER FOUNDATION
To provide financial support to non-profit organizations that provide recreational activities including clearwater for youth, inc., arc tampa bay, inc., and the city of clearwater, florida, each a sponsor agency of the LONG CENTER FOUNDATION, inc.
$281k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants
1
Communities
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of LONG CENTER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
artsleadershipskillsempower
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k8 grants · $81k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CITY OF CLEARWATER$200,000
- PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC$10,768
- COMMUNITY TAMPA BAY INC$10,000
- GIRLS INCORPORATED OF PINELLAS$10,000
- GIRLS ROCK ST PETE INC$10,000
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SUNCOAST INC$10,000
- CULTURED BOOKS LITERACY FOUNDATION INC$10,000
- YMCA OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG$10,000
- ARTS CONSERVATORY FOR TEENS$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Boys & Girls Club of Pbc
The club is a voluntary organization which provides educational, athletic and social services to children and teens throughout palm beach county, florida.
Youth Development
2
Boys & Girls Clubs of St Helena
To provide all young people a safe, positive and unique place to develop their natural talents and to inspire them to achieve their full potential, and to equip all children with the skills to become productive, responsible and caring…
Youth Development
3
Girl Scouts of Gulfcoast Florida Inc
Girl Scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place. Girl Scouting is girl led, where girls work together and learn collaboratively and experientially. Girls work under the guidance, coaching…
Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Florida Inc
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
Youth Development
5
Tomball Area Swim Club
Tomball Area Swim Club TASC is a year round competitive swim team offering high quality professional coaching and technique instruction for youth swimmers of all levels of ability. TASC is a registered member of USA and Gulf Swimming.…
Recreation & Sports
6
Teen Court of Sarasota Inc
To introduce area youth to activities and services that promote feelings of self-esteem and self improvement when they develop a healthy attitude toward authority. all organizational activities instill and teach the benefits of law abiding…
Youth Development
7
Boys and Girls Club of Tracy
Enable young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Youth Development
8
Young Men's Christian Association
To put christian principles into practice with programs that build healthy spirit mind & body for all
Human Services
9
Boys & Girls Clubs
To enable youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Sarasota and
Youth Development
11
St Pete Gators
To help provide a safe enviroment for inner city kids
Arts & Culture
12
St Petersburg Aquatics Inc
To provide an aquatics program for pinellas county youth that provides them the opportunity to develop physical, mental and social skills for lifelong personal growth as well as maximum realization of each individual's potential.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clearwater for Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Girls Rock St Pete Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$884,189Youth Development$102,811Human Services$20,000Crime & Legal$10,768
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLEARWATER AQUATIC TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds CLEARWATER FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF PINELLAS ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ROCK ST PETE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SUNCOAST INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG ↗
- Who funds ARTS CONSERVATORY FOR TEENS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TAMPA BAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Pinellas Community FoundationFL26.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Pinellas Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LONG CENTER FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CLEARWATER AQUATIC TEAM INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 593164776 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CLEARWATER AQUATIC TEAM INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Long Center Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Long Center Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines