Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Long Center Foundation

To provide financial support to non-profit organizations that provide recreational activities including clearwater for youth, inc., arc tampa bay, inc., and the city of clearwater, florida, each a sponsor agency of the LONG CENTER FOUNDATION, inc.

$237k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182021.

Recreation & Sports$737k
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF CLEARWATER$200,000
CLEARWATER FOR YOUTH INC$37,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY OF CLEARWATER: $200k → 12%CITY OF CLEARWATER: $179k → 12%CITY OF CLEARWATER: $175k → 12%CITY OF CLEARWATER: $100k → 12%CLEARWATER FOR YOUTH INC: $37k → 12%CLEARWATER AQUATIC TEAM INC: $25k → 12%CLEARWATER AQUATIC TEAM: $21k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Club of Pbc

The club is a voluntary organization which provides educational, athletic and social services to children and teens throughout palm beach county, florida.

Youth Development
2
Boys & Girls Clubs of St Helena

To provide all young people a safe, positive and unique place to develop their natural talents and to inspire them to achieve their full potential, and to equip all children with the skills to become productive, responsible and caring…

Youth Development
3
Girl Scouts of Gulfcoast Florida Inc

Girl Scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place. Girl Scouting is girl led, where girls work together and learn collaboratively and experientially. Girls work under the guidance, coaching…

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Florida Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
5
Tomball Area Swim Club

Tomball Area Swim Club TASC is a year round competitive swim team offering high quality professional coaching and technique instruction for youth swimmers of all levels of ability. TASC is a registered member of USA and Gulf Swimming.…

Recreation & Sports
6
Teen Court of Sarasota Inc

To introduce area youth to activities and services that promote feelings of self-esteem and self improvement when they develop a healthy attitude toward authority. all organizational activities instill and teach the benefits of law abiding…

Youth Development
7
Boys and Girls Club of Tracy

Enable young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
8
Young Men's Christian Association

To put christian principles into practice with programs that build healthy spirit mind & body for all

Human Services
9
Boys & Girls Clubs

To enable youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Sarasota and
Youth Development
11
St Pete Gators

To help provide a safe enviroment for inner city kids

Arts & Culture
12
St Petersburg Aquatics Inc

To provide an aquatics program for pinellas county youth that provides them the opportunity to develop physical, mental and social skills for lifelong personal growth as well as maximum realization of each individual's potential.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clearwater for Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Girls Rock St Pete Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 3 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF CLEARWATER — $654,189 · OtherCITY OF CLEARWATERCLEARWATER AQUATIC TEAM INC — $45,811 · Youth DevelopmentCLEARWATER A…CLEARWATER FOR YOUTH INC — $37,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLEARWATER F…
Other$654,189Youth Development$82,811

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEARWATER AQUATIC TEAM INC — $45,811 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetCLEARWATER FOR YOUTH INC — $37,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinellas Community FoundationFL26.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinellas Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Long Center Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph