Loading…
· Private foundation
Long Arc Foundation
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$78k
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
5
Communities
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
International$36kPhilanthropy$35kHuman Services$34kHealth$23kEducation$17kOther$33k
02FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
- NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$30,000
- MOSAIC HEALTH CENTER INC$20,000
- MYRIAD USA INC$15,000
- UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NE$5,000
- THE FISTULA FOUNDATION$3,000
- WOMEN DONORS NETWORK$3,000
- MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC$1,000
- COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY GRANTMAKERS INC$750
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$75k · 3 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1353% since the first grant, against +124% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
4
Total granted
$75k
$46k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+1353%
+124%
Still filing today
67%
75%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MYRIAD USA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $36k · revenue +856%- MEMEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC3× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +1353%
- UWUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NE3× · 2022–2024 · $15k
Funded once
- CCCLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH INCone grant, 2023 · $18k
NEW JERSEY SEEDS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue +68%- SHSIERRA HOUSEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +328%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Newark Community Health Centers Inc
The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…
Health
2
New Jersey Policy Perspective Inc
New jersey policy perspective (njpp) is a nonpartisan think tank that drives policy change to advance economic, social, and racial justice through evidence-based, independent research, analysis, and strategic communications.
Arts & Culture
3
New Jersey Health Care Quality
To improve the safety, quality,and affordability of healthcare for everyone.
—
4
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc
We fight hunger and poverty in new jersey by assisting those in need and seeking long-term solutions. we engage, educate and empower all sectors of society in the battle (see sch o)
Food & Nutrition
5
New Jersey Health Foundation Inc
The Organization's mission is to support healthcare education, research and patient care programs in the State of New Jersey and for other scientific, charitable, literary and educational purposes.
Health
6
New Jersey Citizen Action
To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and to encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.
—
7
League of Women Voters of New Jersey
A nonpartisan organization empowering voters and defending democracy.
—
8
Independent Colleges and Universities of
The mission of the independent colleges and universities of new jersey (icunj), a new jersey non-profit corporation is to advance the interests of new jersey's independent, non-profit, public mission institutions of higher education by…
—
9
New Jersey State Nurses Association
Professional association for registered nurses designed to promote the advancement of nurses, nursing and the profession, as an essential independent and distinct social service.
—
10
Common Counsel Foundation
Ccf advances equity and environmental health through a combination of direct grant making and strategic philanthropic advising for client member funds and manages projects focused on organizational development, leadership sustainability…
Community Improvement
11
Community Loan Fund of New Jersey Inc
To transform at-risk communities through strategic investments capital and knowledge.
Community Improvement
12
Community Foundation of Mendocino County
Inspire philanthropy and steward assets to foster vibrant, inclusive and healthy communities throughout mendocino county.
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Council of New Jersey Grantmakers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation of New Jersey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
International$36,000Philanthropy$34,750Human Services$34,000Other$32,500Health$23,000Education$17,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY SEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN DONORS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE FISTULA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY GRANTMAKERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Long Arc Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Sierra House Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOSAIC HEALTH CENTER INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~31 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +89% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 461402143 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MOSAIC HEALTH CENTER INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 31 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Long Arc Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Long Arc Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines