Skip to content
Logan Health at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Logan Health

Provide support services for subsidiary tax-exempt organizations focused on offering medical services.

$367k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$225kEducation$54kHealth$50kCommunity Improvement$25kFood & Nutrition$10kAnimals$9k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $220,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $366,778 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $146,278 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$110,000
FVCC FOUNDATION$40,000
FLATHEAD SOCCER CLUB$25,000
MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC$12,500
MONTANA LAND TO HAND$10,000
FRONTIER CONFERENCE$10,000
DIGGER ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$7,000
CARROLL COLLEGE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $110k → 9%FVCC FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%DIGGER ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $7k → 16%NORTHERN TRANSIT INTERLOCAL: $20k → 18%PONDERA COALITION FOR PROGRESS: $11k → 20%MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $56k → 9%FLATHEAD COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORT: $25k → 11%FRONTIER CONFERENCE: $10k → 9%FLATHEAD SOCCER CLUB: $25k → 11%CARROLL COLLEGE: $6k → 9%MONTANA LAND TO HAND: $10k → 11%FVCC FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $13k → 11%MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$240k · 3 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$240k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $166k · revenue +4%
  • FV
    FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $48k · revenue -25%
  • ME
    MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • FC
    FLATHEAD COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • NT
    NORTHERN TRANSIT INTERLOCAL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flathead Land Trust

Flathead land trust is dedicated to the conservation of northwest montana's land and water legacy through voluntary agreements with private land owners. flt's primary program service is private land conservation through voluntary…

Environment
2
Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America Montana

Inform, educate & represent member interests

—
3
Lone Star Conference

The mission of the lone star conference is to foster student participation and success among member institutions in ncaa division ii intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of each institution's total educational program. it shall…

Education
4
Michigan High School Athletic Assoc

To conduct interscholastic athletic tournaments throughout the state, consistent with educational values of high school curriculums, to provide assistance in the training of coaches, athletic directors and officials, as well as the…

Education
5
Montana Grizzly Scholarship Association

The montana grizzly scholarship association's (mgsa) primary objective is to raise scholarship funds for the university of montana (um) student-athletes. the mgsa also assists the athletic department with various fundraising activities,…

—
6
Northwest Conference

Through its values, the northwest conference unites its member colleges and universities in the pacific northwest to empower student-athletes in their pursuit of academic and athletic excellence at the division iii level.

Recreation & Sports
7
Montana State Golf Association

The montana state golf association (msga) is the allied golf association governing amateur golf in montana. the msga administers the world handicap system for clubs in montana and provides course rating evaluations and handicap review for…

Recreation & Sports
8
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
9
Fallbrook Sports Association

The mission of this corporation is to operate, maintain, and improve recreational and sports facilities and fields owned by California public agencies and non-profit organizations and to support and develop amateur atheletic organizations…

Recreation & Sports
10
Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference

The rocky mountain athletic conference empowers student-athletes to realize their full potential in athletics, academics and in life through a richly rewarding and nationally competitive experience at our unique ncaa division ii…

Recreation & Sports
11
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
12
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference

To collaborate with other conferences in formulating and implementing an improved model for the conduct of intercollegiate athletics, this is consistent, with the conferences values. to sustain athletic excellence while significantly…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Flathead Livestock Sale Organization; the most unlike its peers is Montana Equestrian Events Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $166,250 · EducationMONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONDIGGER ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · EducationCARROLL COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $48,400 · OtherFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLE…FLATHEAD COUNTY: $25,000 · OtherFLATHEAD COUNTYNORTHERN TRANSIT INTERLOCAL: $20,000 · OtherNORTHERN TRANSIT INTERLOCALPONDERA COALITION FOR PROGRESS: $10,600 · OtherPONDERA COALITION FOR PROGRESSMONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA EQUESTRIAN EV…FLATHEAD VALLEY UNITED SC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsFLATHEAD VALLEY UNITE…SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONT…Frontier Conference: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFrontier ConferenceMONTANA LAND TO HAND: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFLATHEAD LIVESTOCK SALE ORGANIZATION: $8,742 · Animals
Education$179,250Other$104,000Recreation & Sports$71,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Animals$8,742

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $166,250 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $48,400 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFLATHEAD VALLEY UNITED SC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFrontier Conference: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMONTANA LAND TO HAND: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFLATHEAD LIVESTOCK SALE ORGANIZATION: $8,742 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDIGGER ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate Banc…Fidelity Investments …
First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Logan Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Logan Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Logan Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home