· Public charity
Logan Health
Provide support services for subsidiary tax-exempt organizations focused on offering medical services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $220,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $366,778 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $146,278 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION | $110,000 |
| FVCC FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| FLATHEAD SOCCER CLUB | $25,000 |
| MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC | $12,500 |
| MONTANA LAND TO HAND | $10,000 |
| FRONTIER CONFERENCE | $10,000 |
| DIGGER ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION | $7,000 |
| CARROLL COLLEGE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · $166k · revenue +4%
- FVFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $48k · revenue -25%
- MEMONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue -3%
Funded once
- FCFLATHEAD COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $25k
- NTNORTHERN TRANSIT INTERLOCALone grant, 2023 · $20k
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Flathead land trust is dedicated to the conservation of northwest montana's land and water legacy through voluntary agreements with private land owners. flt's primary program service is private land conservation through voluntary…
Inform, educate & represent member interests
The mission of the lone star conference is to foster student participation and success among member institutions in ncaa division ii intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of each institution's total educational program. it shall…
To conduct interscholastic athletic tournaments throughout the state, consistent with educational values of high school curriculums, to provide assistance in the training of coaches, athletic directors and officials, as well as the…
The montana grizzly scholarship association's (mgsa) primary objective is to raise scholarship funds for the university of montana (um) student-athletes. the mgsa also assists the athletic department with various fundraising activities,…
Through its values, the northwest conference unites its member colleges and universities in the pacific northwest to empower student-athletes in their pursuit of academic and athletic excellence at the division iii level.
The montana state golf association (msga) is the allied golf association governing amateur golf in montana. the msga administers the world handicap system for clubs in montana and provides course rating evaluations and handicap review for…
Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…
The mission of this corporation is to operate, maintain, and improve recreational and sports facilities and fields owned by California public agencies and non-profit organizations and to support and develop amateur atheletic organizations…
The rocky mountain athletic conference empowers student-athletes to realize their full potential in athletics, academics and in life through a richly rewarding and nationally competitive experience at our unique ncaa division ii…
The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…
To collaborate with other conferences in formulating and implementing an improved model for the conduct of intercollegiate athletics, this is consistent, with the conferences values. to sustain athletic excellence while significantly…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Flathead Livestock Sale Organization and the most unlike its peers is Montana Equestrian Events Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC ↗
- Who funds FLATHEAD VALLEY UNITED SC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA LAND TO HAND ↗
- Who funds Frontier Conference ↗
- Who funds FLATHEAD LIVESTOCK SALE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds DIGGER ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Logan Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.