Loading…
· Public charity
Lodi Memorial Hospital Association Inc
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
$223k
Granted FY2024
7
Grants
2
Communities
$64k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Philanthropy$1.6MHealth$228kHuman Services$5kOther$494k
02FY2024 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$212M
Total assets
Largest grants
- California Health Fund & Trust$63,854
- Lodi Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc$40,194
- United Way of San Joaquin County$31,500
- Shriners Childrens Northern California$20,000
- Lodi Academy$10,000
- Lodi District Chamber Of Commerce$6,020
- Annunciation School$6,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 5 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
2
Total granted
$2.3M
$13k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+7%
+55%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLodi Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $233k · revenue +512%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue +14%
- UWUnited Way of San Joaquin County6× · 2018–2024 · $162k · revenue +7%
Funded once
March Of Dimes Incone grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -41%- ECEl Conciliograduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
California Chamber of Commerce
Represent members and cal employers to members of cal legislature and other agencies of state government through in-house legislative analysts, lobbying staff, and contract lobbyists. cal chamber publishes books and software related to…
—
2
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin
The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with the compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.
Health
3
California Association of Hospitals and
Education and representation before legislative and regulatory bodies for member hospitals.
—
4
Hospital Council of N & C California
To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.
—
5
Valley Children's Healthcare
To support health care activities and programs and to provide health care services to children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin.
Health
6
California Hospitals Committee on Issues
To participate in and educate the public about health issues and ballot proposition activity related to health issues or of concern to hospitals and health systems.
—
7
California Primary Care Association
Position community health clinics to be key players in the health care delivery system to improve the health status of their communities.
Health
8
La Clinica Del Valle
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
—
9
Los Altos Chamber of Commerce
To identify and analyze issues of interest and concern to los altos/los altos hills and the business community, recommend to the board of directors advocacy positions on those issues that the committee deems appropriate, and communicate…
—
10
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
Health
11
California Dental Association
Cda is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
Community Improvement
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation
See schedule o : to eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic and underserved communities in…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$1,602,994Other$493,888Health$228,000Human Services$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds California Health Fund & Trust ↗
- Who funds Lodi Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds United Way of San Joaquin County ↗
- Who funds Lodi District Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds Shriners Childrens Northern California ↗
- Who funds March Of Dimes Inc ↗
- Who funds El Concilio ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Lodi Memorial Hospital Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Lodi Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 942719880 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Lodi Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Lodi Memorial Hospital Association Inc?
Find your warmest path to Lodi Memorial Hospital Association Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines