Skip to content
Lock Haven University Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Lock Haven University Foundation

To generate and manage resources for the benefit of commonwealth university - lock haven and its students.

$943k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$943k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$7.6MHealth$8kAnimals$2kReligion$300Public Safety & Disaster$50Recreation & Sports$50Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$942,572
Median grant
1
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$942,572
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $227) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION: $227 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 5 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$7.6M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+25%

Still filing today

40%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $5.6M
  • CU
    COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.9M
  • SA
    STUDENT AUXILIARY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $10k

Funded once

  • CC
    Clinton County SPCAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +98%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2019 · $350 · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
Lancaster General Health Foundation

The lancaster general health foundation is organized and operated to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of members of the healthcare system of lancaster general health, a non-profit corporation described in…

Philanthropy
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
5
The Penn State Research Foundation

The Penn State Research Foundations mission is to foster and advance scientific research which includes creating, purchasing, holding and licensing of rights for inventions, designs and intellectual property of The Pennsylvania State…

Education
6
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
7
Pennsylvania Society of Anesthesiologists Inc

The mission of the pennsylvania society of anesthesiologists is to stimulate interest and encourage progress in the specialty of anesthesiology. the psa works to achieve these goals with annual scientific meetings, philanthropic endeavors…

—
8
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
11
Emergency Nurses Association

To lead the advancement of excellence and innovation in emergency nursing through research, education, resources, advocacy and collaboration.

Education
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Stroudsburg University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY: $5,642,482 · OtherLOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITYCOMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,947,008 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA+10 more: $17,636 · OtherClinton County SPCA: $2,400 · AnimalsNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,034 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $350 · EducationCLARION UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $350 · EducationEAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $350 · EducationNLN Foundation for Nursing Education: $40 · EducationGO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION: $227 · Human Services
Other$7,607,126Animals$2,400Health$2,034Education$1,090Human Services$227

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $6,222 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClinton County SPCA: $2,400 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,034 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARION UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION: $227 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTSIDE FIRE RESCUE OF LOCK HAVEN: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS' HOSE COMPANY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNLN Foundation for Nursing Education: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate A…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lock Haven University Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lock Haven University Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lock Haven University’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home